Re: DMVPN phase 3 example

Sounds like you need a DUAL Hub, DUAL DMVPN arcticture. You can control
Phase 3 through tunnel interface EIGRP metrics.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/technologies_white_paper09186a008018983e.shtml#dualhubdual

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Marcin Zgola <MZgola_at_netrixllc.com> wrote:

> YES, with spokes connecting to different hubs I want to be able to have
> spoke to spoke connectivity
>
>
>
> *From:* Donald Virgil [mailto:d.virgil88_at_gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 05, 2009 6:10 PM
> *To:* Marcin Zgola
> *Cc:* ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> *Subject:* Re: DMVPN phase 3 example
>
>
>
>
>
> Would you still need dynamic connectivity between SPOKE1 and SPOKE2?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Marcin Zgola <MZgola_at_netrixllc.com> wrote:
>
> Any examples out there to run 2 hubs, and 2 spokes using DMVPN phase 3
> EIGRP.
>
> Where spoke 1 uses hub 1 as primary, and spoke 2 uses hub 2 as primary.
>
> I am comfortable setting this up using phase 2, where all you have to do
> is modify routing protocol to accomplish that.
>
> Since phase 3 uses NHRP for its packet switching , gets me little
> confused about setup like that.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Nov 05 2009 - 19:12:56 ART