Re: single area ospf with or without are 0

Keehan

Your obvious thing is not obvious to me.
I dont see anything wrong with a single stub area here.

Can you pls elaborate :)

On Wednesday, November 11, 2009, <Keegan.Holley_at_sungard.com> wrote:
> No, obviously the area can't be a stub or anything like that. All the
> routes would only need to be known to a single area so there would be no
> need for area 0. I wouldn't do this anywhere but a lab though.
>
> Keegan Holley b * Network Engineer I b * SunGard Availability Services b *
> 401 North Broad St. Philadelphia, PA 19108 b * (215) 446-1242 b *
> keegan.holley_at_sungard.com Keeping People and Information ConnectedB. b *
> http://www.availability.sungard.com/
>
> P Think before you print
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain
> confidential, proprietary and privileged information, and unauthorized
> disclosure or use is prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error,
> please notify the sender and delete this e-mail from your system.
>
>
>
> From:
> Tomasz Zajac <t_zajac_at_o2.pl>
> To:
> ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Date:
> 11/10/2009 04:58 PM
> Subject:
> single area ospf with or without are 0
> Sent by:
> <nobody_at_groupstudy.com>
>
>
>
> Hello
>
> I have a simple question about ospf. Does single area (non zero)
> implementation need connection to area 0.
>
> --
> --
> Greetings
> Tomasz Zajcc
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Nov 11 2009 - 17:12:39 ART