Hi Ravi,
The diagram shows a set of four flow queues, each with four packets of
varying lengths. For the sake of discussion, assume that the SN of the
previously sent packet is zero in this case. Each flows first packet
arrives at the same instant in time, and all packets for all flows arrive
before any more packets can be taken from the WFQ queues.
                                 Flow 1
                          1500 byte,
Packet4            Packet3              Packet1           Packet1
                          Precedence 0        SN=194,304,000
SN=145,728,000       SN=97,152,000     SN=48,576,000
Flow 2
Packet8            Packet7              Packet6           Packet5
                          1000 byte,          SN=129,536,000
SN=97,152,000        SN=65,536,000     SN=32,384,000
                          Precedence 0
Flow 3
Packet12           Packet11             Packet10          Packet9
                          500 byte,           SN=65,536,000
SN=48,576,000        SN=32,384,000     SN=16,192,000
                          Precedence 0
Flow 4
Packet16           Packet15             Packet14          Packet13
                          100 byte,           SN=12,954,600
SN=9,715,200         SN=6,553,600      SN=3,238,400
                          Precedence 0
For the record, the order the packets would exit the interface, assuming no
other events occur, is 13 first, then 14, followed by 15, 16, 9, 5, 10, 1,
11, 6, 12, 2, 7, 8, 3, 4.
My question is Why Packet 5 is dequeue first before Packet 10 although both
have same SN.?
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Jan 15 2010 - 16:39:26 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 04 2010 - 20:28:41 ART