I'm confused.  Are we playing a gameshow :P  But for the records,
BiDir PIM doesn't use the concept of (S,G) groups so the sharing of
sources between RPs is sort of broken.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:59 AM, David Prall <dcp_at_dcptech.com> wrote:
> Joe,
> Correct response.
>
> And why does anycast break BiDir PIM?
>
> David
>
> --
> http://dcp.dcptech.com
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Joe Astorino [mailto:jastorino_at_ipexpert.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 8:54 AM
>> To: David Prall
>> Cc: Scott Morris; ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com; Carlos G Mendioroz; Hans
>> None; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>> Subject: Re: PIM BIDIR
>>
>> Thank you!  OK -- Typically you can do this with something known as
>> Phantom RP.  With phantom RP you have a few options.
>>
>> 1) The "phantom" RP is actually not a real router : )  Yes, I know it
>> sounds insane.  The RP in bi-dir PIM does not have to be a specific
>> physical router.  It can be an entity -- basically a subnet.  As long
>> as people can get to the subnet, they can reach the "RP"
>>
>> 2) Phantom RP with longest match -- In this case you will assign
>> multiple routers the same loopback address but with different masks.
>> So say your RP is 1.1.1.1
>>    R1: 1.1.1.1/32
>>    R2: 1.1.1.1/30
>>    R3: 1.1.1.1/29
>>
>> due to the longest prefix match rules, you have redundancy.
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:46 AM, David Prall <dcp_at_dcptech.com> wrote:
>> > With all of the non-english speaking individuals that make up
>> groupstudy I
>> > find it funny we can even think about proper English grammar.
>> >
>> > Now back to BiDir PIM. Can anyone tell me how you provide for RP
>> redundancy
>> > in a BiDir environment, using static RP configuration?
>> >
>> > David
>> >
>> > --
>> > http://dcp.dcptech.com
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf
>> Of
>> >> Scott Morris
>> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 8:02 AM
>> >> To: Joe Astorino
>> >> Cc: ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com; Carlos G Mendioroz; David Prall; Hans
>> >> None; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>> >> Subject: Re: PIM BIDIR
>> >>
>> >>  I find it more ironic that a list just full of wonderful grammar
>> >> lesson
>> >> candidates decides to take the time to actually worry about this
>> one!
>> >> IMHO, I would not consider Joe to be one of the "big offenders".
>> >>
>> >> ;)
>> >>
>> >> Joe Astorino wrote:
>> >>
>> >>   OK -- I find it "interesting" that David and I thought of the same
>> >>   thing.  Jesus Christ...
>> >>
>> >>   On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 7:48 AM,    <ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>     Carlos is questioning your use of the word ironic and rightfully
>> >> so.  Very cool that gs provides grammar lessons here and there.  :)
>> >>
>> >>     -----Original Message-----
>> >>     From: Joe Astorino     <jastorino_at_ipexpert.com>    Date: Tue, 26
>> >> Jan 2010 07:15:33
>> >>     To: Carlos G Mendioroz    <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>    Cc: David Prall
>> >> <dcp_at_dcptech.com>    ; Hans None    <acsyao_at_hotmail.com>    ;
>> >> <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>    Subject: Re: PIM BIDIR
>> >>
>> >>     Yep , just saying it was ironic how David and I thought of the
>> same
>> >> thing.
>> >>
>> >>     On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Carlos G Mendioroz
>> >> <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>     wrote:
>> >>
>> >>       Where is the irony ?
>> >>       Networks are graphs, and when you need a cycle free set of
>> arcs
>> >> (links)
>> >>       that connect all the nodes (routers/switches) you are looking
>> for
>> >>       a spanning tree. It's all already defined in mathematics, and
>> we
>> >>       are reusing already defined terms :) (thanks God we did not
>> >> reinvent
>> >>       the wheel once !!!)
>> >>
>> >>       Dijkstra was never thinking of cisco when he did SPF algo
>> either.
>> >>
>> >>       -Carlos
>> >>
>> >>       Joe Astorino @ 25/01/2010 21:09 -0300 dixit:
>> >>
>> >>         It will forward up to the RP via the DF interface.
>>  Ironically
>> >> I sort
>> >>         of think about it like spanning-tree too.  The DF is sort of
>> >> like your
>> >>         designated port -- It is the best path up to the RP.  So the
>> >> multicast
>> >>         starts sending and hits a router, and goes UP the multicast
>> >> tree
>> >>         (hence the bi-dir term) towards the RP via the DF interface.
>> >> Once the
>> >>         RP gets the information it will be sent DOWN the shared tree
>> to
>> >>         receivers.
>> >>
>> >>         On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:55 PM, David Prall
>> >> <dcp_at_dcptech.com>         wrote:
>> >>
>> >>           Based on what interface the multicast packet was received
>> on.
>> >> The RP sets
>> >>           the root of the tree and that is all in BiDir. I like to
>> >> think of BiDir as
>> >>           Spanning-Tree for IP Multicast, with the RP being the
>> root.
>> >>
>> >>           --          http://dcp.dcptech.com
>> >>
>> >>             -----Original Message-----
>> >>             From:             nobody_at_groupstudy.com             [
>> >> mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com            ] On Behalf Of
>> >>             Hans None
>> >>             Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 3:47 PM
>> >>             To:             ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>>  Subject:
>> >> PIM BIDIR
>> >>
>> >>             All,
>> >>
>> >>             When a non RP router received a mcast packet, where
>> should
>> >> the router
>> >>             forward
>> >>             the packet? Toward the RP or toward the mcast group OIL?
>> >>
>> >>             My question is, how will a non RP router pin point its
>> own
>> >> position?
>> >>             Whether
>> >>             it was in the path from the source to RP or from RP to
>> the
>> >> destination
>> >>             group?
>> >>
>> >>             Thanks,
>> >>
>> >>             Hans
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _________________________________________________________________
>> >>             Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
>> >> http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390708/direct/01/
>> >>
>> >>             Blogs and organic groups at
>> http://www.ccie.net
>> >>
>> >>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >>             Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >>
>> >>           Blogs and organic groups at           http://www.ccie.net
>> >>
>> >>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >>           Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >>
>> >>       --
>> >>       Carlos G Mendioroz        <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>        LW7 EQI
>> >> Argentina
>> >>
>> >>     --
>> >>     Regards,
>> >>
>> >>     Joe Astorino CCIE #24347 (R&S)
>> >>     Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>> >>     Mailto:     jastorino_at_ipexpert.com    Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>> >>     Live Assistance, Please visit:     www.ipexpert.com/chat
>>  eFax:
>> >> +1.810.454.0130
>> >>
>> >>     IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco
>> >> CCNA
>> >>     (R&S, Voice & Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (R&S, Voice,
>> >>     Security & Service Provider) Certification Training with
>> locations
>> >>     throughout the United States, Europe and Australia. Be sure to
>> >> check
>> >>     out our online communities at     www.ipexpert.com/communities
>> >> and our
>> >>     public website at     www.ipexpert.com
>> >>
>> >>     Blogs and organic groups at     http://www.ccie.net
>> >>
>> >>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >>     Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >>
>> >>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Joe Astorino CCIE #24347 (R&S)
>> Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>> Mailto: jastorino_at_ipexpert.com
>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>> Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
>> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>>
>> IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA
>> (R&S, Voice & Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (R&S, Voice,
>> Security & Service Provider) Certification Training with locations
>> throughout the United States, Europe and Australia. Be sure to check
>> out our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our
>> public website at www.ipexpert.com
>
>
-- Regards, Joe Astorino CCIE #24347 (R&S) Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert Mailto: jastorino_at_ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat eFax: +1.810.454.0130 IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA (R&S, Voice & Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) Certification Training with locations throughout the United States, Europe and Australia. Be sure to check out our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Tue Jan 26 2010 - 09:02:32 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 04 2010 - 20:28:42 ART