Re: L code routes

 Have you been playing with JUNOS lately? :)

Anyway, keep in mind that most-specific routing always wins. It's a way
of making sure that nobody else injects a route in that may mess up your
reachability. Even if you have a "C"onnected route on an interface
(AD=0), learning a more-specific route (/32 or whatever) will take
precedence over that. And Cisco's "thinking" never accounts for the
actual directly-attached IP address but rather sees it as part of the
larger group.

HTH,

Scott Morris, CCIEx4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,

JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.

JNCI-M, JNCI-ER

evil_at_ine.com

Internetwork Expert, Inc.

http://www.InternetworkExpert.com

Toll Free: 877-224-8987

Outside US: 775-826-4344

Knowledge is power.

Power corrupts.

Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......

CCIE wrote:

  Hi Experts,

  What would the result of inserting an L (local routes) in the local table.
  
  L 10.2.3.3/32 . f0/0

  Regards,
  
  Amin

  Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
  _______________________________________________________________________
  Subscription information may be found at: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Feb 11 2010 - 08:19:08 ART