Not a problem!
HTH!
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Marcel Lammerse <m.lammerse_at_mac.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your quick response Divin :) Just what I was looking for!
>
> Congratulations on passing your CCIE exam. You earned it mate.
>
>
> On 13/02/2010, at 15:15 , Divin Mathew John wrote:
>
> > Check this out. http://www.internetworkexpert.com/rfc/rfc1403.txt
> > 3.  BGP Identifier and OSPF router ID
> >
> >    The BGP identifier MUST be the same as the OSPF router id at all
> >    times that the router is up.
> >
> >    This characteristic is required for two reasons.
> >
> >      i    Synchronisation between OSPF and BGP
> >
> >           Consider the scenario in which 3 ASBRs, RT1, RT2, and RT3,
> >           belong to the same autonomous system.
> >
> >
> >                                      +-----+
> >                                      | RT3 |
> >                                      +-----+
> >                                         |
> >
> >                           Autonomous System running OSPF
> >
> >                                  /               \
> >                              +-----+          +-----+
> >                              | RT1 |          | RT2 |
> >                              +-----+          +-----+
> >
> >
> >           Both RT1 and RT2 have routes to an external network X and
> >           import it into the OSPF routing domain.  RT3 is advertising
> >           the route to network X to other external BGP speakers.  RT3
> >
> >
> >
> > Varadhan                                                        [Page 5]
> >
> > RFC 1403                  BGP OSPF Interaction              January 1993
> >
> >
> >           must use the OSPF router ID to determine whether it is using
> >           RT1 or RT2 to forward packets to network X and hence build the
> >           correct AS_PATH to advertise to other external speakers.
> >
> >           More precisely, RT3 must determine which ASBR it is using to
> >           reach network X by matching the OSPF router ID for its route
> >           to network X with the BGP Identifier of one of the ASBRs, and
> >           use the corresponding route for further advertisement to
> >           external BGP peers.
> >
> >      ii   It will be convenient for the network administrator looking at
> >           an ASBR to correlate different BGP and OSPF routes based on
> >           the identifier.
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Marcel Lammerse <m.lammerse_at_mac.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I know this is not common these days, as BGP synchronization is turned
> off by default in recent ios versions. However, I was wondering if anyone
> knows why a Cisco router considers an OSPF route not synchronized, if the
> OSPF router id and BGP router id don't match.
> >
> > Is this an implementation-specfic thing or is there some protocol design
> thinking behind it?
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Sent from Doha, Qatar
>
>
-- Sent from Doha, Qatar Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Sat Feb 13 2010 - 07:46:24 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 01 2010 - 06:28:35 ART