On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 17:51, Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> As i stated in my e-mail, the latency that i saw was in 2 different areas,
> one area wasB the correct next-hop being injected into the routers which was
> a direct result of theB peer sessionB being terminated between scan intervals.
> When i was testing this feature, once BGP detected the adjacency change, it
> terminated the peering between the scan intervals. Again, if you tested this
> with what ever version of IOS you have and it worked correctly without this
> latency being an issue, then, it is a nice solution. so once again when you
> tested this, was the latency an issue?
There were no issues that I noticed, especially since BGP scanner is
nowadays is not used for next-hop tracking. There is a different
method, as you are probably aware.
Oh yeah, this also doesn't work in IOS older than 12.4(4)T - bummer.
-- Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack time with our Blended Learning Solution! Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Sun Mar 28 2010 - 17:58:15 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Apr 01 2010 - 07:26:36 ART