RE: Netflow and FWSM

Netflow version 9 supports Layer2. Not sure to what detail. Have you looked
at that?

Charles Henson

|------------>
| From: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Fadel Lubbos <fadellubbos_at_hotmail.com> |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| To: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |<tscott_at_ipexpert.com>, CCIE Group Study CCIE Group Study <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com> |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Date: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |03/31/2010 10:34 AM |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Subject: |
|------------>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |RE: Netflow and FWSM |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Hi Tyson

All VLANS routing (SVIs) has been configured in the FWSM and for that we
cannot do layer 3 netflow in the 6513 Switch.
We are going to use Lancope FlowSensor in our case for FWSM.
Thank you,

Fadel J.

> From: tscott_at_ipexpert.com
> To: fadellubbos_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Netflow and FWSM
> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:19:17 -0400
>
> Why do you need to do Netflow on the FWSM when it is supported on the
6500?
> I guess I am not sure how the traffic would look different if you capture
it
> from the 6500 or the FWSM.
>
> The ASA as of version 8.2 supports NSEL but I am not sure this would be
> ported to the FWSM as there is already a reliable resource on the 6500 to
> capture that information.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
> Mailto: tscott_at_ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208
> Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Fadel Lubbos
> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 9:11 AM
> To: CCIE Group Study CCIE Group Study
> Subject: Netflow and FWSM
>
> Hello GS
>
>
> We are evaluating LANCOPE net flow analysis started with Cisco 6513 Core
> Switch. All VLANS SVIs has been configured in the FWSM.
>
> Netflow is not supported in FWSM.
>
> Are there any updates to this or any word around to this limitation?
>
> Thank you in advanced.
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsofts powerful SPAM protection.
> https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Thu Apr 01 2010 - 13:39:22 ART