With your /7, both candidate routes have the same AS Path.
With the /5, there is variety and therefore a concatenation (AS
Sequence/Set) needs to be performed.
Same, but different.   ;)
HTH,
Scott
mohmmad imran wrote:
> Hi Experts,
>
> I have three router in AS 100
>
> R1=Fa0/0-----------------Fa0/0=R2
>                 |
>                 |
>               Fa0/0
>                 |
>                 R3
>
>
> R1 is getting the route 112.0.0.0/8 to 119.0.0.0/8 from as-path 54 50 60 and advertsie it to R3
>
> R1 SH IP BGP Output:- 
>
> *> 112.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0             0 54 50 60 i
> *> 113.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0             0 54 50 60 i
> *> 114.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0             0 54 i
> *> 115.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0             0 54 i
> *> 116.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0             0 54 i
> *> 117.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0             0 54 i
> *> 118.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0             0 54 i
> *> 119.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0             0 54 i
>
>
> R3 SH IP BGP Output:- 
>
> *>i112.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0    100      0 54 50 60 i
> *>i113.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0    100      0 54 50 60 i
> *>i114.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0    100      0 54 i
> *>i115.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0    100      0 54 i
> *>i116.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0    100      0 54 i
> *>i117.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0    100      0 54 i
> *>i118.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0    100      0 54 i
> *>i119.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0    100      0 54 i
>
>
> If try to aggregate above subnets into one prefix on R1 with:- 
>
> router bgp 100
> aggregate-address 112.0.0.0 248.0.0.0 summary-only as-set
>
> I can see that the router is setting up the AS-SET in BGP table, as per below output:- 
>
> s>i112.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0    100      0 54 50 60 i
> *> 112.0.0.0/5      0.0.0.0                      100  32768 {54,50,60} i
> s>i113.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0    100      0 54 50 60 i
> s>i114.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0    100      0 54 i
> s>i115.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0    100      0 54 i
> s>i116.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0    100      0 54 i
> s>i117.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0    100      0 54 i
> s>i118.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0    100      0 54 i
> s>i119.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0    100      0 54 i
>
> but instead of aggregating all route,if I try to aggregate 112.0.0.0/8 and 113.0.0.0/8 into on 112.0.0.0/7 prefix, router generate the aggregate prefix in BGP table instead of showing the AS-SET it shows the AS-PATH-SEQ on aggregated prefix.
>
> router bgp 100
> aggregate-address 112.0.0.0 254.0.0.0 summary-only as-set
>
> s>i112.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0    100      0 54 50 60 i
> *> 112.0.0.0/7      0.0.0.0                       100  32768 54 50 60 i
> s>i113.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0    100      0 54 50 60 i
> *>i114.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0    100      0 54 i
> *>i115.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0    100      0 54 i
> *>i116.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0    100      0 54 i
> *>i117.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0    100      0 54 i
> *>i118.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0    100      0 54 i
> *>i119.0.0.0        1.1.1.254               0    100      0 54 i
>
>
> I tried it on two differenet IOS version with same result,I am missing something here?
>
> -Imran
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at: 
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Apr 18 2010 - 03:32:43 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat May 01 2010 - 09:49:57 ART