RE: OT: DMVPN VS GETVPN

Well,

if you are not running critically secure documentation I am not sure of the
reason for encryption but I think the design purpose of GetVPN is for
exactly your situation. If you have another device that can act as the
key-server this may be the route to take.

Regards,

Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP

Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

Mailto: <mailto:tscott_at_ipexpert.com> tscott_at_ipexpert.com

From: NeT [mailto:netmrt_at_gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 1:51 PM
To: Tyson Scott
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: OT: DMVPN VS GETVPN

this private line which is layer 2 MPLS (QinQ) were all traffic must pass HO
router.
you can consider it hub and spoke connection.

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Tyson Scott <tscott_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:

You forgot the third; GetVPN over DMVPN. Is this public or leased lines.
will the provider accept traffic across it from any source any destination?
Too little information... too many choices.

Regards,
 
Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: tscott_at_ipexpert.com

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of NeT
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 1:15 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: OT: DMVPN VS GETVPN

Hi

which one is better DMVPN or GETVPN. I have two links for each branch to HO
and this link is layer 2 connectivity from 2 different ISP.

Regards,

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed May 19 2010 - 14:30:50 ART