Re: EIGRP neighborship fails

From: rajeevan singh <rajeevansingh_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 03:20:05 +0530

HI Irena/All

Thanks for the reply but I just wanted to confirm whether having the same
router-id in EIGRP also can cause neighbor flap.
One more thing why do we change the K values ( if it has to match all the
way then we are not going to make any preferance)
R1--R2-----R3----R4, Here we cant change the K values between any two
routers , so my question is how changing K value can be fruitful ?

Thanks.
Rajeevan.

On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 2:07 AM, Irena Nikolova <irenna_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Rajeevan,
>
> Routers that want to become EIGRP neighbors must have:
> 1. The same AS number
> 2. Matching K values
> 3. The same type of authentication and the same key (if authentication is
> configured.)
> 4. The source IP address used by the neighbors must be in the same subnet.
>
> Any of these can be a reason for EIGRP adjacencies to be lost.
>
> cheers,
> Irena
>
>
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:45 PM, rajeevan singh <rajeevansingh_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi ,
>>
>> What are all the possible reason because of which EIGRP neighorship can
>> fail.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat May 29 2010 - 03:20:05 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jun 01 2010 - 07:09:54 ART