Thanks For reply, this could be the 1 way
Regards,
http://prakashkalsaria.wordpress,com
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Rich Collins <nilsi2002_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I would suggest MQC for the traffic shaping but somehow the routing
> protocol traffic has  to be accounted for as a bandwidth percentage or
> LLQ.  The other traffic classes left over could be shaped.
>
> For not dropping the routing protocol  traffic you can use de-list
> (discard eligible).  Set all other traffic discard-eligible.
>
> I reset the frame-relay counters and you can see that the DE packets
> out is a bit less than the total number  of output packets.
>
> i.e.
> frame-relay de-list 1 protocol ip list 101
>
>
> interface Serial1/1
>  ip address 24.24.24.4 255.255.255.0
>  encapsulation frame-relay
>  serial restart-delay 0
>  frame-relay de-group 1 402
>  frame-relay map ip 24.24.24.2 402 broadcast
>  no frame-relay inverse-arp
>  no clns route-cache
> !
>
> access-list 101 deny   pim any any
> access-list 101 deny   tcp any eq bgp any
> access-list 101 deny   tcp any any eq bgp
> access-list 101 permit ip any any
>
>
>
> R4#sh frame-relay pvc
>
> PVC Statistics for interface Serial1/1 (Frame Relay DTE)
>
>              Active     Inactive      Deleted       Static
>  Local          1            0            0            0
>  Switched       0            0            0            0
>  Unused         0            0            0            0
>
> DLCI = 402, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE = Serial1/1
>
>  input pkts 7             output pkts 7            in bytes 665
>  out bytes 627            dropped pkts 0           in pkts dropped 0
>  out pkts dropped 0                out bytes dropped 0
>  in FECN pkts 0           in BECN pkts 0           out FECN pkts 0
>  out BECN pkts 0          in DE pkts 0             out DE pkts 5
>  out bcast pkts 0         out bcast bytes 0
>  pvc create time 00:28:52, last time pvc status changed 00:28:52
> R4#
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Prakash Kalsaria
> <kalsaria.prakash_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Question:
> > In Frame-relay traffic shaping,
> > How do we Ensure, Routing protocols are not candidate to be shaped or
> > droped
> >
> > Regards,
> > Prakash Kalsaria
> > http://prakashkalsaria.wordpress.com
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Jun 27 2010 - 18:03:20 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Aug 01 2010 - 09:11:38 ART