I am.
Not too much of a big deal though.
I think GNS3 is really GREAT at some things. It's just that...when you are
studying for CERTAIN EXAMS. I tend to go with the more Stable with more
options, even though the road to learning it WELL was very difficult
sometimes. It was worth it!! Currently I run it over UBUNTU. I have had very
few problems. Only when I used the wrong version of Dynagen.
All of my Serial Interfaces were unstable and caused problems like Asif is
seeing.
GNS3 is way better off the ground!
Paul
-- Paul Negron CCIE# 14856 CCSI# 22752 Senior Technical Instructor www.micronicstraining.com > From: --Hammer-- <bhmccie_at_gmail.com> > Reply-To: --Hammer-- <bhmccie_at_gmail.com> > Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:43:06 -0500 > To: <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com> > Subject: Re: retry limit exceeded -MSG > > Paul, > Are you saying there are differences in reliability/stability > running straight dynamips as opposed to running GNS3 and all it's glory > gui? Just trying to understand the statement. > > --Hammer-- > > > On 8/25/2010 11:34 AM, Paul Negron wrote: >> I would just run straight Dynamips. It has done me very little wrong since >> its inception. If you need help with it, let me know. >> >> Paul > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Wed Aug 25 2010 - 10:52:52 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Sep 01 2010 - 11:20:53 ART