Can you do a sh ip nat statistics and send the output 
CCIE # 23962 (SP)
Sent from my iPhone 3GS
On 20 Sep 2010, at 8:11 PM, karim jamali <karim.jamali_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank You guys for your support. Below are the configurations:
> 
> int gi0/1
> ip nat inside
> 
> int dialer1
> ip nat outside
> 
> ip nat inside source list BATAL-RUH-USERS interface Dialer1 overload
> ip nat inside source static 192.168.2.234 78.93.56.234
> ip nat inside source static 192.168.2.235 78.93.56.235
> ip nat inside source static 192.168.2.236 78.93.56.236
> ip nat inside source static 192.168.2.237 78.93.56.237
> ip nat inside source static 192.168.2.238 78.93.56.238
> 
> Extended IP access list BATAL-RUH-USERS
>    10 deny ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 (5 matches)
>    20 deny ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255
>    30 deny ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255
>    40 deny ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255
>    50 permit ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 any (3091 matches)
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Jeferson Guardia <jefersonf_at_gmail.com>wrote:
> 
>> Paste your configs here so we can advise you the best way to tune your nat
>> config, there are a few ways that you can limit the max nat entry value on a
>> router and this has showed to be quite useful in the past.
>> 
>> Brgs,
>> 
>> 2010/9/20 Shahid Ansari <shahid1357_at_gmail.com>
>> 
>> This can be happen If you have many translation generated by third party
>>> programs or Virus.
>>> when you are enabled NAT ,dont allow any to any in access-list and make it
>>> more specific
>>> The best way to troubleshoot it by enabling netflow ...
>>> Can you post
>>> Show process Cpu
>>> Show nat translation
>>> show ip cache flow
>>> 
>>> change default nat timeout value too..
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> Shahid Ansari
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:46 PM, karim jamali <karim.jamali_at_gmail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Dear Experts,
>>>> 
>>>> I have faced a problem with one of the Routers at a customer site having
>>>> the
>>>> NAT Ager process consuming 98% of CPU. I am trying to understand the
>>>> reason,
>>>> however up till now I am not able.
>>>> 
>>>> I would truly appreciate your input as I have 4 sites with the same
>>>> configuration and I haven't been able to spot the difference that caused
>>>> this problem.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> KJ
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> KJ
> 
> 
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at: 
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Sep 20 2010 - 20:15:26 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Oct 01 2010 - 05:58:05 ART