Re: Ignoring MED (BGP question)

Just curious... What would be the reason to keep it if you are going
to ignore it?

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 03:16, Jack Router <pan.router_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your answer but it does not answer my question. The question was
> if it is possible to ignore a MED instead of setting metric=0.
>
> On 21 November 2010 20:29, Zack (Doc) <zack_at_tnan.net> wrote:
>
>> MED should only be compared (by default) when it's coming from the same AS.
>> B Why do you want to ignore it? B Why is setting via RM not clean? B I just
>> told my carrier to ignore my MED (cause they are using
>> "always-compare-med")
>> and I told them to put this on their existing RM
>>
>> route-map CUSTOMER_X_INBOUND permit 1
>> B set metric=0
>> B continue
>>
>> It's just that easy.
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 17:20, Jack Router <pan.router_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello Experts,
>> > How to ignore MED information received from neigbouring EBGP router ? I
>> can
>> > set metric = 0 via a route-map but this is not as clean as ignoring an
>> > information would be
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net