Thomas,
I don't think this is the way to go. He has found something he does not
understand, what better time to master it ? He'd better not find a 
consequence of this behaviour during a troubleshooting session :)
Anthony,
you are using vrf management in the traceroute command, aren't you ?
Or else you are using the default...
-Carlos
Thomas Perrier @ 06/01/2011 03:29 dixit:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Anthony Bonilla
> <anthonybonilla.ccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Sorry if I was not clear but there is a default route in management vrf but
>> whenever I try to connect to another IP that is on a different subnet,
>> switch tries to use "default vrf" and it does not work...
> 
> Well, the point of VRFs is to separate routing tables, isn't it? ;) If
> you wish to mix, then configure inter VRF routing on the Layer 3
> device uplink.
> 
> But in your case, I would find easier to forget the Mgmt0 port and
> management VRF ever existed, and manage the 5000 using a SVI.
> 
> -Thomas
> 
> 
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at: 
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
-- Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Thu Jan 06 2011 - 09:00:27 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Feb 01 2011 - 07:39:17 ART