Sounds like a problem with the import RT for vrf VPN_A ?
The route is there with RT 100:55. What are you importing ?
-Carlos
Tom Kacprzynski @ 29/01/2011 14:23 -0300 dixit:
> Hello experts,
> Doing a lab wiht MP-BGP and can't seem to figure out how is it possible to
> get this output. When I do *show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf VPN_A *I don't see
> 172.16.5.0/24 route, but when i do *show ip bgp vpnv4 all *I see that same
> route. Shouldn't both of them show the same information. I this lab  (INE
> 14.5)  I'm asked to rewrite that prefix's route target and export it from
> one VRF table to the VPN_A table.
> 
> Rack1R6#*show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf VPN_A*
> BGP table version is 41, local router ID is 150.1.6.6
> Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
> internal,
>               r RIB-failure, S Stale
> Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
> 
>    Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> Route Distinguisher: 100:1 (*default for vrf VPN_A*)
>      <----- no 172.16.5.0/24 route (see below)
> *>i155.1.58.0/24    150.1.5.5                0    100      0 ?
> *> 155.1.67.0/24    0.0.0.0                  0         32768 ?
> *> 172.16.7.0/24    155.1.67.7               0         32768 ?
> 
> 
> Rack1R6#*show ip bgp vpnv4 all*
> BGP table version is 41, local router ID is 150.1.6.6
> Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
> internal,
>               r RIB-failure, S Stale
> Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
> 
>    Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> Route Distinguisher: 100:1 (*default for vrf VPN_A*)
> *>i155.1.58.0/24    150.1.5.5                0    100      0 ?
> *> 155.1.67.0/24    0.0.0.0                  0         32768 ?
> **>i172.16.5.0/24    150.1.5.5                0    100      0 ?
>      <*---- 172.16.5.0/24
> *> 172.16.7.0/24    155.1.67.7               0         32768 ?
> Route Distinguisher: 100:2 (default for vrf VPN_B)
> *>i155.1.5.0/24     150.1.5.5                0    100      0 ?
> *> 155.1.76.0/24    0.0.0.0                  0         32768 ?
> **>i172.16.5.0/24    150.1.5.5                0    100      0 ?**
>         <*---- 172.16.5.0/24
> *> 192.168.6.0      0.0.0.0                  0         32768 ?
> *> 192.168.7.0      155.1.76.7               0         32768 ?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Rack1R6#*show ip bgp vpnv4 all 172.16.5.0*
> BGP routing table entry for 100:1:172.16.5.0/24, version 31
> Paths: (1 available, best #1, *no table*)
>   Not advertised to any peer
>   Local
>     150.1.5.5 (metric 66) from 150.1.4.4 (150.1.4.4)
>       Origin incomplete, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best
>       Extended Community: RT:100:55
>       Originator: 150.1.5.5, Cluster list: 150.1.4.4
>       mpls labels in/out nolabel/25
> BGP routing table entry for 100:2:172.16.5.0/24, version 34
> Paths: (1 available, best #1, table *VPN_B*)
>   Not advertised to any peer
>   Local, imported path from 100:1:172.16.5.0/24
>     150.1.5.5 (metric 66) from 150.1.4.4 (150.1.4.4)
>       Origin incomplete, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best
>       Extended Community: RT:100:55
>       Originator: 150.1.5.5, Cluster list: 150.1.4.4
>       mpls labels in/out nolabel/25
> 
> 
> Thank you for any help.. i'm really stuck on this and can't figure it out. I
> fee like i'm missing some piece of information.
> 
> 
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at: 
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
-- Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Sat Jan 29 2011 - 14:45:18 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Feb 01 2011 - 07:39:17 ART