I don't remember having to reload the router, but may be some
config sequence yields the router to a havoc state :)
-Carlos
ALL From_NJ @ 16/02/2011 09:36 -0300 dixit:
> I did try that, but that did not work.  For some reason ppp could not 
> negotiate ip, everything was set up right so I could not understand why 
> it was happening.    I figured what the heck, let me restart the router.
> 
> Debug ppp negotiation showed that ip could not be sent ... something 
> like ip packet output fail.  since this was during the time that ppp 
> would bind the interface ..., as part of the negotiation,  I figured it 
> must be internal.
> 
> Your thoughts?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> On Feb 16, 2011 4:39 AM, "Carlos G Mendioroz" <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar 
> <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>> wrote:
>  > Did you try bouncing the interfaces before that ? (i.e. shut/no shut)
>  >
>  > -Carlos
>  >
>  > ALL From_NJ @ 16/02/2011 01:55 -0300 dixit:
>  >> This was an interesting lab test. Humm ... I am thinking of how this
>  >> might help speed up any lab tasks ...
>  >>
>  >> For the life of me, I could not get IP up and going till I rebooted 
> each
>  >> router. Then all is happy ;-)
>  >>
>  >> The link I provide is a good one to go through.
>  >>
>  >> Thanks again gents
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:04 AM, ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com 
> <mailto:all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>
>  >> <mailto:all.from.nj_at_gmail.com <mailto:all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>>> wrote:
>  >>
>  >> Interesting question and answer. Some caveats as well ...
>  >>
>  >> Here is a link I found:
>  >> 
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk759/technologies_white_paper09186a00801348bc.shtml
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> I need to try this later today, this looks cool.
>  >>
>  >> Thanks for the Q&A guys!
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Carlos G Mendioroz
>  >> <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar 
> <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>>> wrote:
>  >>
>  >> This depends on the speed of the interface, but if LFI is deemed
>  >> necessary, a multilink will be created *on this router*.
>  >> (LFI := Link Fragmentation & Interleaving)
>  >> For this to work (again ?) you need a corresponding configuration
>  >> on the other side of the link!
>  >>
>  >> -Carlos
>  >>
>  >> Hussam EL Kebbi @ 15/02/2011 05:40 -0300 dixit:
>  >>
>  >> Hi Experts,
>  >> When we apply: auto qos voip command under interfaces, it
>  >> will create
>  >> multilink xxx with state down, and all commands are
>  >> transferred to this
>  >> multilink. Is this multilink stays down state? Can you
>  >> please explain what do
>  >> we expect?
>  >> Thanks
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>  >>
>  >> _______________________________________________________________________
>  >> Subscription information may be found at:
>  >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> --
>  >> Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> 
> <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>>>
>  >> LW7 EQI Argentina
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>  >>
>  >> _______________________________________________________________________
>  >> Subscription information may be found at:
>  >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> --
>  >> Andrew Lee Lissitz
>  >> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com <mailto:all.from.nj_at_gmail.com> 
> <mailto:all.from.nj_at_gmail.com <mailto:all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> --
>  >> Andrew Lee Lissitz
>  >> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com <mailto:all.from.nj_at_gmail.com> 
> <mailto:all.from.nj_at_gmail.com <mailto:all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>>
>  >
>  > --
>  > Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>> LW7 
> EQI Argentina
> 
-- Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Wed Feb 16 2011 - 09:47:31 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Mar 01 2011 - 07:01:50 ART