RE: RIPv2 Vs EIGRP Autosummarization

Hi Nabrik,

Is that while crossing major networks or the same major network but different
subnet masks length

let's say i have the following topology :

LAN 1 <----------> R1 <----- serial -----> R2 <----- serial -----> R3
10.10.10.1/24 10.0.12.0/30 10.0.23.0/30

If i redistribute connected on R1 into RIP. How will R3 see the routes ?

Thx

> Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 23:18:44 -0800
> Subject: Re: RIPv2 Vs EIGRP Autosummarization
> From: narbikk_at_gmail.com
> To: hadytannous_at_hotmail.com
> CC: aaron1_at_gvtc.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>
> Just to add to whats been said.
> RIPv2 (With auto summary) will summarize the redistributed routes to their
> major network boundary, whereas, Eigrp (With Auto summary) will NOT do
that.
>
> That's if i am reading your question correcly.
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 10:48 PM, hady tannous
<hadytannous_at_hotmail.com>wrote:
>
> > Thx Aaron
> >
> >
> > Does RIPv2 summarizes accross discontiguous subnet masks ?
> >
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > > CC: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> > > From: aaron1_at_gvtc.com
> > > Subject: Re: RIPv2 Vs EIGRP Autosummarization
> > > Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 21:00:47 -0600
> > > To: hadytannous_at_hotmail.com
> > >
> > > One thing I know is eigrp installs summary route to null0; I don't
think
> > ripv2 does that.... AD difference I think is 5 and 120
> > >
> > > Aaron
> > >
> > > On Mar 6, 2011, at 2:57 AM, hady tannous <hadytannous_at_hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What's the difference between RIPv2 Vs EIGRP Autosummarization ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > TIA
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > > >
> > > >
Received on Mon Mar 07 2011 - 10:50:28 ART