Thank you Yaser for your response.
A lab test always helps me!
In my lab, I redistributed a loop back on the nssa ABR. I did this with and
without the command option of no-redistribute. The no-redistribute command
keeps the other nssa routers from seeing this redistributed route, but the
area 0 routers can see it just fine. So ... I can still redistribute this
on a nssa ABR, without the nssa routers seeing this as a N2 (type 7).
Cool.
I still think my original solution was good enough, but I can see how the
no-redistribute command option even takes this one step further. picky
picky picky these practice tests can be ;-(((
Here is the command reference:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/iproute_ospf/command/reference/iro_osp1.html#wp1025669
Thanks Yasser and team!
TIA,
Andrew
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:29 PM, ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey team,
>
> I was doing a practice lab today and the lab gave me this task:
>
> - Do not allow any external or inter area OSPF routing information to
> enter Area 26 from R1. Do not use any prefix-based filtering techniques.
>
> - I then read ahead in the OSPF config section and saw that I was later
> going to have to redistribute a Loopback into this area. So I knew the
> answer (or thought I knew)
>
> Ok "area 26 nssa no summary" - should be easy points right?
>
> I got the section wrong because the solution was looking for "area 26 nssa
> no-redistribute no-summary"
>
> I have read about the no-redistribute option, but am a little confused
> still. To me, I do not see the difference adding this "no-redistribute"
> option makes.
>
> I am going to lab this up in for the next 1/2 hour or so and wondered if
> anyone had any input, suggestions, etc...
>
> Have a good night team,
>
> --
> Andrew Lee Lissitz
> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
>
-- Andrew Lee Lissitz all.from.nj_at_gmail.com Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Sat May 14 2011 - 00:07:14 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jun 01 2011 - 09:01:11 ART