Re: discontiguous area problem

Are there OSPF adjacencies between R1/R3, R2/R4 and R7/R8 in process ID 100
or is it purely static routing? Do R1 and R2 have a route to R4's
loopback? Does your R4/R8 GRE tunnel come up? Do you have an OSPF
adjacency on the tunnel in OSPF process ID 11 in area 0?

On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Mark Matters <markccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> I meant process ID 100 is dept A and process ID 11 is dept B.
>
> Every interface is in area 0. I have 3 discontiguous area 0's, Dept B
> <---> Dept A <----> Dept B I want Dept B to talk to each other.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Joe Astorino <joeastorino1982_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> A clear list or diagram showing exactly what area and OSPF process every
>> interface participating in OSPF is in would be helpful here. I am not
>> quite clear on how R1, R2 and R7 are linked via area 100 but are also "all
>> in area 0". Also you reference dept. B as OSPF area 11 but then say the
>> routers in department B are running OSPF process ID 11 ... AND they are
>> "all in area 0". A very clear diagram would be useful.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Mark Matters <markccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> There are static routes between R1 and R3, R2 and R4 and R7 and R8.
>>> Keeping
>>> OSPF area 100 (dept A) and OSPF area 11 (dept B) separated.
>>>
>>>
>>> R1, R2, R7 are in department A and have connections to each other via
>>> OSPF
>>> area 100 in the 10.x.x.x/20 subnet. All routers are in area 0
>>>
>>>
>>> R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R9 and R10 are in department B and running ospf 11
>>> are
>>> in the 172.16.x.x/20 subnet. All routers are in area 0.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> R1 --- R3 --- R5 ---R6
>>> |
>>> | | | |
>>> R2 --- R4 -----------
>>> |
>>> |
>>> |
>>> R7 ---- R8 --- R9 --- R10
>>> |------------------|
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am not able to ping R1 to R4 and R2 to R4's loopbacks even through I
>>> have
>>> static routes between r1/r3 and r2/r4 and I am redistributing the static
>>> routes on both r1 and r2.
>>>
>>>
>>> R3, R4 and R8 and originating default routes via default information
>>> originate always metric type 1, R4 has metric 60 added to make it the
>>> primary path but it doesn't seem to do anything.
>>>
>>>
>>> I have 3 area 0's. One in dept A and two in dept B. I want to join only
>>> the
>>> two in Dept B via a GRE tunnel between R4 and R8 but I am not getting any
>>> OSPF routes on either side of the tunnel.
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Joe Astorino
>> CCIE #24347
>> Blog: http://astorinonetworks.com
>>
>> "He not busy being born is busy dying" - Dylan
>>
>>
>

-- 
Regards,
Joe Astorino
CCIE #24347
Blog: http://astorinonetworks.com
"He not busy being born is busy dying" - Dylan
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net