RE: [cisco-voip] CUCM trunk connection

From: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch_at_heliontechnologies.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 14:59:58 +0000

I have used SIP for intercluster in the past as it allowed presence
information to be shared. I think that answers 1 and 2, not sure about 3.

Matthew Loraditch, CCVP, CCNA, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
support_at_heliontechnologies.com<mailto:support_at_heliontechnologies.com>
(p) (410) 252-8830
(F) (443) 541-1593

Visit us at www.heliontechnologies.com<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>
Support Issue? Email
support_at_heliontechnologies.com<mailto:support_at_heliontechnologies.com> for fast
assistance!

From: cisco-voip-bounces_at_puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces_at_puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of davidytk
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 9:26 AM
To: cisco-voip_at_puck.nether.net; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM trunk connection

Hi All

For CUCM cluster interconnection, we also use inter-cluster trunk on the
CUCM.

For my client standard, they use SIP trunk for the CUCM cluster
inter-connection. I have some question about this design.

1. Is it possible to use SIP trunk to the CUCM interconnection.
2. If the design is correct, what is the advantage for using SIP trunk
instead of inter-cluster trunk.
3. As my client has Cisco SIP phone, is it the reason they need SIP
trunk to the CUCM interconnection.

Thanks
Best Regards
David

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 6694 (20111208) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Dec 08 2011 - 14:59:58 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jan 01 2012 - 08:27:00 ART