Re: Reachability - Interfaces not included

I would have to agree with Marc on this one. I don't believe there would
be such, if they provide networks they more than likely will ask you to
redistribute or advertise them in some way. however if you have questions
don't be affraid to ask. I was affraid to ask, and lost a ton of
points!!!!!! that won't happen again.

On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 2:21 PM, marc abel <marcabel_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> I would ask the proctor on that, I haven't seen much ambiguity in this
> regard though.
>
> Yes, static map those frame interfaces.
>
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Tom Kacprzynski <tom.kac_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > During the test you are asked to make sure to have full reachability. If
> > there are interfaces you were never asked to advertised internally or
> > redistributed, what would you do?
> > 1. Leave them and don't include them as part of the full reachability
> test
> > 2. Redistribute them as connected.
> > 3. Ask the proctor.
> >
> > On a similar note what about Frame Relay directly connected interface,
> > should those have a static mapping so they could can be pinged locally or
> > only if they are specified in the task requirements?
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Dec 27 2011 - 21:28:30 ART