Re: MPLS LABEL

Thanking you kindly for answering my question.

I did try that and now its clear. Finally completed MPLS and MPLS VPN
topics.

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> Mohammad,
>
> I do that in my books to make it easier for the student to look at the LIB
> and understand which LSR produced the label. But you won't do anything like
> that in real world implementation. When we see MPLS for the first time, it
> can get kind of confusing, but i found that this makes it a little easier.
>
> BTW, Good question.
>
> But you can always restrict the number of labels to something lower (Like
> 20, "100 120") and then, test it with adding more routes and see the error
> message.
>
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Scott Morris <swm_at_emanon.com> wrote:
>
> > I have lots of unread GS e-mails, so I just resorted by name to look
> > through them... My memory is good, but not THAT good. :)
> >
> > No worries though!
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > On 1/15/12 12:46 PM, Imran Ali wrote:
> >
> > sorry guys for VI openion , ha ha EUI- 64 for a serial , Seriously do
> > still you remember my question or did some search on GS . ?
> > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Scott Morris <swm_at_emanon.com> wrote:
> >
> > And if you don't know the answer, just how can you determine
> > whether the
> > VS tag will apply prior to asking?
> >
> > How about tagging responses like that as VI for very irritating?
> > *shrug*
> >
> > Perfectly valid question and simple enough to answer. Could they
> > have
> > tested it on their own? Sure, just set the label range to have
> > like 10
> > labels and there's less config before running into the problem.
> > :)
> >
> > But they asked. In case you haven't noticed, there's a LOT of
> > that
> > which occurs, and yet the questions are answered. I could select
> > your
> > question about EUI-64 for serial interfaces back in September as
> > a
> > potential example there.
> >
> > Relax a little! </rant>
> >
> > *Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider)
> > #4713,
> >
> > CCDE #2009::D, CCNP-Voice, JNCIE-SP #153, JNCIE-ER #102, CISSP,
> > et al.
> >
> > CCSI #21903, JNCI-SP, JNCI-ER
> >
> > swm_at_emanon.com
> >
> > Knowledge is power.
> >
> > Power corrupts.
> >
> > Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
> >
> > On 1/15/12 10:37 AM, Imran Ali wrote:
> > >> Apologies in advance for a very silly question but I am stuck
> > so need an
> > >> answer.
> > >>
> > > Dont mind but please tag the subject line as VS very silly
> > before posting
> > > such questions
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> What If I a PE router configured for a label range say 200
> > 299. I have only
> > >> 100 label and if I have 500 routes in that network, how does
> > this MPLS
> > >> label work ?
> > >>
> > >> MPLS label is assigned to each route . I created a own lab to
> > learn MPLS
> > >> and I am now stuck at this. I will add some loopbacks and see
> > how it works
> > >> and will reduce the label range to say 20 and will add some 30
> > loop back
> > >> but if someone can explain me so that I can see them in
> > action.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> R3#show mpls forwarding-table
> > >> Local Outgoing Prefix Bytes Label Outgoing Next Hop
> > >> Label Label or Tunnel Id Switched interface
> > >> 300 Pop Label 2.2.2.2/32 0 Et0/0 10.1.23.2
> > >> 301 201 4.4.4.4/32 0 Et0/0 10.1.23.2
> > >> 302 Pop Label 10.1.24.0/24 0 Et0/0 10.1.23.2
> > >> 303 No Label 1.1.0.1/32[V] 0 Se1/1
> > >> point2point
> > >> 305 No Label 1.1.1.1/32[V] 0 Se1/1
> > >> point2point
> > >> 306 No Label 1.1.2.1/32[V] 0 Se1/1
> > >> point2point
> > >> 307 No Label 1.1.3.1/32[V] 0 Se1/1
> > >> point2point
> > >> 308 No Label 1.1.4.1/32[V] 0 Se1/1
> > >> point2point
> > >> 309 No Label 1.1.5.1/32[V] 0 Se1/1
> > >> point2point
> > >> 310 No Label 1.1.6.1/32[V] 0 Se1/1
> > >> point2point
> > >> 311 No Label 1.1.7.1/32[V] 0 Se1/1
> > >> point2point
> > >> 312 No Label 1.1.8.1/32[V] 0 Se1/1
> > >> point2point
> > >> 313 No Label 1.1.9.1/32[V] 0 Se1/1
> > >> point2point
> > >> 314 No Label 1.1.10.1/32[V] 0 Se1/1
> > >> point2point
> > >> 315 No Label 10.1.13.0/24[V] 520 aggregate/CA
> > >> 316 No Label 192.168.1.0/24[V] \
> > >> 0 Se1/1 point2point
> > >>
> > >> Thanking you kindly in advance.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > >> Subscription information may be found at:
> > >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >
> > >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> *Narbik Kocharians
> *CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
> *www.MicronicsTraining.com* <http://www.micronicstraining.com/>
> Sr. Technical Instructor
> YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
> Training & Remote Racks available
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Jan 16 2012 - 14:56:17 ART