Re: distance 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 [word] - standard ip

sorry i keep confusing AD with metric. I still don't see AD change. In any
event I will be working through this and most likely post a follow up.
thanks for help so far.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 8:40 AM, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Christian:
>
> I am working through a redistribution-heavy Cisco 360 lab. Commands came
> from the CLI mentor (answer key). I understand that this is
> locally significant. If that is the case, then I am not understanding why
> the configuration is used as this subnet was never OSPF owned.
>
> I did test moving the AD to 10 on OSPF. It didn't change metric on routing
> table...
>
> Marc
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Christian Hunter <stasis416_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure I'm understanding what your trying to achieve. However, your
>> stating that your not seeing routes on R1 with a distance of 171 and the
>> relevant config you post is for R4 where your setting distance to 171 via
>> the standard named ACL.
>>
>> Remember distance is locally significant. If you change the distance on a
>> router it impacts how that router determines feasibility of routing
>> protocols, AD doesn't get passed on the routing domain. So if you want to
>> see R1 with routes of 171 AD, you need to modify the distance there. Your
>> solution of how your applying distance looks fine. It just needs to be a
>> standard ACL.
>>
>> Hope that helps.
>> Christian Hunter
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:37 AM, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Btw. Still no change to AD.
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2012, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Sorry nick. I meant AD.... Thanks for clarification
>>> >
>>> > On Wednesday, January 25, 2012, Nick E <ccienovice_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> Hi Marc,
>>> >>
>>> >> distance command will change the AD on the router and not the metric.
>>> If
>>> you want change the metric use the below command:-
>>> >>
>>> >> redistribute eigrp 30 metric 171 subnets
>>> >>
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >> Nick
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:00 AM, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I have :
>>> >>>
>>> >>> lo7-SW3->EIGRP->R4->OSPF->R1
>>> >>>
>>> >>> lo7 shows up in r4 table as eigrp external:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> D EX 135.15.107.0 [170/261120] via 135.15.20.7, 04:47:15,
>>> FastEthernet0/0
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I am redistributing this into ospf 1 and sending along to r1
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Type-5 AS External Link States
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Tag
>>> >>> 135.15.107.0 135.15.104.1 1314 0x80000002 0x009409 0
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Furthermore this is advertised with AD of 171 not to overtake routes
>>> that
>>> >>> could potentially show up on neighbor with a 'distance 171 0.0.0.0
>>> >>> 255.255.255.255 ospf-distance'
>>> >>>
>>> >>> R4#sh ip access-lists ospf-distance
>>> >>> Standard IP access list ospf-distance
>>> >>> 10 permit 135.15.107.0
>>> >>> 20 permit 135.15.110.0
>>> >>> 30 permit 135.15.120.0
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I am not seeing any hits on ACL nor am these routes on R1 with a
>>> distance
>>> >>> of 171:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> O E2 135.15.107.0 [110/20] via 135.15.14.4, 00:00:17,
>>> Serial0/0/0.14
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Here is relavant config on R4:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> router ospf 1
>>> >>> log-adjacency-changes
>>> >>> area 10 virtual-link 135.15.101.1
>>> >>> redistribute connected subnets route-map connected->ospf
>>> >>> redistribute eigrp 30 subnets route-map eigrp->ospf
>>> >>> network 135.15.10.4 0.0.0.0 area 0
>>> >>> network 135.15.14.4 0.0.0.0 area 10
>>> >>> network 135.15.34.4 0.0.0.0 area 10
>>> >>> distance 171 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 ospf-distance
>>> >>>
>>> >>> ip access-list standard ospf-distance
>>> >>> permit 135.15.107.0
>>> >>> permit 135.15.110.0
>>> >>> permit 135.15.120.0
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I thought this would redistribute eigrp learned route with metric of
>>> 171 to
>>> >>> neighbors. This isn't a big problem on R1 but it causes a recursive
>>> routing
>>> >>> problem on neighbor R5.... Am I not understanding how this command
>>> works?
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> >>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Jan 25 2012 - 12:43:26 ART