Re: bgp best path confusion

I would save router-id.

Regards,
 Joe Sanchez

( please excuse the brevity of this email as it was sent via a mobile device. Please excuse misspelled words or sentence structure.)

On Aug 29, 2012, at 11:57 AM, oo IPX <oispxl_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> i have a hub and spoke topology, R1 being hub.
>
> R1-is a Route reflector.
>
> also, R1, R2 and R3 are fully meshed ibgp peers. with R1, R2 and R3
> advertising networks 1.0.0.0/8, 2.0.0.0/8 and 3.0.0.0/8
>
> *on what level of the bgp path decision making the following route is been
> chosen?*
>
>
>
> *R3(config-router)#do sh ip bgp 2.0.0.0
> BGP routing table entry for 2.0.0.0/8, version 4
> Paths: (2 available, best #2, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
> Flag: 0x820
> Not advertised to any peer
> Local
> 10.1.12.2 (metric 1) from 10.1.13.1 (1.1.1.1)
> Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal
> Originator: 2.2.2.2, Cluster list: 1.1.1.1
> Local
> 10.1.12.2 (metric 1) from 10.1.12.2 (2.2.2.2)
> Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best
> *
>
>
> Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> *>i1.0.0.0 10.1.13.1 0 100 0 i
> ** i2.0.0.0 10.1.12.2 0 100 0 i
> *>i 10.1.12.2 0 100 0 i*
> *> 3.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Aug 29 2012 - 20:44:03 ART