Re: OT: Is WAAS that bad?

From: Muhammad Nasim <muhammad.nasim_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 08:50:18 +0300

Hi Alexander,

We have to accept the truth that Cisco is not leading all the technologies
and products in the market. Cisco is having tough competition across all
the products and technologies and even in switching as well.

Riverbed and Juniper Wan acceleration is much better then Cisco WAAS.

if you see NAC , Cisco moved from propriety NAC solution to standard based
NAC Solution i.e. ISE. Juniper was offering it since they released their
product and I heard Aruba is also doing good in NAC market as well.

HTH

Thanks & Best Regards

On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Alexander Lim <cisco.alexand_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Experts,
>
> While looking for some comparison between Cisco WAAS and Riverbed
> SteelHead, I found this article
> http://m.networkworld.com/community/blog/cisco-finally-shows-waas-app-nav-cisco-live-0.
> Is it telling the truth? Is Cisco WAAS really that bad? What do you guys
> use in your network?
>
> Thanks for sharing.
>
> Regards,
> Alex
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Muhammad Nasim
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Sep 01 2012 - 08:50:18 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Oct 01 2012 - 06:40:29 ART