Re: udld

Thanks for the reply guys, however with aggressive mode,when you have a cpu
busy state, this puts the ports in errdisable state, in this case normal
works well as STP takes further decision (If there is a loop, STP will
detect it). I agree that STP timer is more but i am still not convinced
aggressive is better. I am trying to compare advantages / disadvantages of
both

On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Tony Singh <mothafungla_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> In normal mode port does not get err disabled but goes into an
> undetermined state, in aggressive mode port gets err disabled & 8 frames
> are sent per second to re negotiate the link
>
> See good post from Petr, best to go with aggressive really....
>
> http://blog.ine.com/2008/07/05/udld-modes-of-operation/
>
> --
> BR
>
> Tony
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 1 Nov 2012, at 19:45, Pratik Gotecha <pgotecha4_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello experts,
> >
> > I am trying to make a decision between using udld aggressive vs normal.
> Can
> > someone throw light on which one is better and why ?
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Nov 01 2012 - 16:10:49 ART