To further explain...In a different question, there was complaints about
connection problems to several networks. They had redundant paths, I fixed
one of the paths and the pings were successful. I did not get the points
due to the fact that both paths were not.
I seems like one has to infer that the technology is completely fixed as
intended. It is not so much about just fixing the problem. I will have to
keep this in mind for the next assessment.
Oh man, I want this thing so bad I can taste it, but holy crap this is
hard.
e
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Eduardo Vazquez <evazquez_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> R1--S0/1--10.1.1.1/24--DLCI201--frame relay
> switch--DLCI102--10.1.1.2/24--S0/1--R2
>
> It was a very simple resolution LMI type was incorrect on one side. Took
> the erroneous LMI type statement out, and ping works.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ed Vazquez
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Tony Singh <mothafungla_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So you got the same subnets behind two different routers?
>>
>> Draw a topology please
>>
>> --
>> BR
>>
>> Tony
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On 1 Apr 2013, at 16:53, Eduardo Vazquez <evazquez_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Tony,
>> >
>> > The routers were connected to the network in question, RX 10.1.1.x/24
>> > connected to RY 10.1.1.y/24.
>> > *
>> > *
>> > *Resolve connection problem. The following command should show
>> responses:*
>> > *
>> > *
>> > *RX# ping 10.1.1.y*
>> >
>> > That is pretty much it.
>> >
>> > If they said that it was a router on another network, then fine you
>> need a
>> > routing protocol...but as it is if the ping is successful, I think good
>> > done with that moving on to the next one.
>> >
>> > John,
>> >
>> > I guess what I am wondering is, if this type of grading is in affect for
>> > the actual test. the test I am talking about is only a
>> > practice assessment.
>> >
>> > Thanks everyone for their insight.
>> >
>> > e
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 10:02 AM, john matijevic
>> > <john.matijevic_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>> >
>> >> If you feel you passed the lab exam, you can request a re-read.
>> >> I believe you need 80% on both Troubleshooting and 80% on
>> >> Configuration to pass the lab exam.
>> >> There should be no doubt whatsoever so if you feel you passed and got
>> >> working per the requirement, then I would go ahead and do the reread.
>> >> No need to explain yourself here, go towards Cisco and work it out with
>> >> them.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> John
>> >> On 4/1/13, Eduardo Vazquez <evazquez_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> Hello Everyone,
>> >>>
>> >>> I am on my 4th attempt at passing the lab exam and as an
>> >>> additional exercise I thought that I would try one of the assessments
>> >> that
>> >>> the 360 program offers.
>> >>>
>> >>> It seems that I did not pass the troubleshooting section although I
>> fixed
>> >>> the problems. Not to be too specific, but in a frame relay scenario
>> they
>> >>> ask you to fix a problem in which one host can not ping the other. I
>> >> fixed
>> >>> the problem so that I could ping the other side successfully, but I
>> did
>> >> not
>> >>> get the points because I did not put a "broadcast" statement in the
>> map.
>> >>> No where in the scenario did it say, "the command "ping x.x.x.x"
>> should
>> >>> work AND make sure that you can run multicast over the link as well."
>> >> Only
>> >>> that "ping x.x.x.x should work."
>> >>>
>> >>> I missed 3 questions in where I met the scenario's requirements. I did
>> >> miss
>> >>> one legitamately, but one as opposed to 4 is the difference between
>> pass
>> >>> and fail.
>> >>>
>> >>> I am not sure what to do about this should I always infer that even
>> if I
>> >>> solve the problem described that there may be a hidden issue as well?
>> >>>
>> >>> Should I address this with Cisco360? I am a bit discouraged by this,
>> as
>> >> I
>> >>> felt very confident about the material.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks for any insight people can share.
>> >>>
>> >>> Ed Vazquez
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Apr 01 2013 - 11:33:40 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 01 2013 - 06:47:40 ART