what platform and IOS version are you using?
3660 and 3725 on GNS have issues with this, suggest using 7200's if this is
the case, I was looking at your next-hop and this is correct & pointing to
an ip-address and not an interface (bgp requires an ip address) so this is
ok
HTH
Tony
On 6 April 2013 20:47, Taio Bone <taiobtnh_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> Stuck with a problem here. The portion of the diagram with the
> issue(R12--back-to-back frame relay-R6)..
>
> R12 and R6 have an established EBGP connection via their loopbacks.Both
> routers have a static route to each other's loopback address. I advertise
> some prefix from R12,they are received by R6 but aren't showing as best
> path,hence they aren't getting installed in the routing table. Here are the
> relevant sections of the config:
>
> *R6
> interface Loopback1
>  ip address 6.6.6.6 255.255.255.0
>  ip ospf network point-to-point
>  ip ospf 1 area 0
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/0.68
>  encapsulation dot1Q 68
>  ip address 68.68.68.6 255.255.255.0
>  ip ospf 1 area 0
> !
> !
> interface Serial1/0
>  ip address 62.62.62.6 255.255.255.0
>  encapsulation frame-relay
>  no keepalive
>  serial restart-delay 0
>  frame-relay interface-dlci 602
> !
> router bgp 100
>  no synchronization
>  bgp log-neighbor-changes
>  network 100.100.100.0 mask 255.255.255.0
>  timers bgp 20 60 20
>  neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 100
>  neighbor 1.1.1.1 update-source Loopback1
>  neighbor 1.1.1.1 next-hop-self
>  neighbor 12.12.12.12 remote-as 54
>  neighbor 12.12.12.12 ttl-security hops 5
>  neighbor 12.12.12.12 update-source Loopback1
>  no auto-summary
> !
> ip forward-protocol nd
> ip route profile
> ip route 12.12.12.0 255.255.255.0 62.62.62.12*
>
>
>
> * R12
> interface Loopback0
>  ip address 12.12.12.12 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Loopback1
>  ip address 200.200.1.1 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Loopback2
>  ip address 200.200.2.1 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Loopback3
>  ip address 200.200.3.1 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Serial1/0
>  ip address 62.62.62.12 255.255.255.0
>  encapsulation frame-relay
>  no keepalive
>  serial restart-delay 0
>  frame-relay interface-dlci 602
> !
> !
> router bgp 54
>  no synchronization
>  bgp router-id 12.12.12.12
>  bgp log-neighbor-changes
>  network 200.200.1.0
>  network 200.200.2.0
>  network 200.200.3.0
>  timers bgp 20 60 20
>  neighbor 6.6.6.6 remote-as 100
>  neighbor 6.6.6.6 ttl-security hops 5
>  neighbor 6.6.6.6 update-source Loopback0
>  no auto-summary
> !
> ip forward-protocol nd
> ip route 6.6.6.0 255.255.255.0 62.62.62.6
> !
>
> R12
>   Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> *  100.100.100.0/24 6.6.6.6                  0             0 100 i
> *> 200.200.1.0      0.0.0.0                  0         32768 i
> *> 200.200.2.0      0.0.0.0                  0         32768 i
> *> 200.200.3.0      0.0.0.0                  0         32768 i
>
>
> R6
>   Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
>
> *  200.200.1.0      12.12.12.12              0             0 54 i
> *  200.200.2.0      12.12.12.12              0             0 54 i
> *  200.200.3.0      12.12.12.12              0             0 54 i
>
>
> *
> There's full layer-2 reachability but the bgp table shows the next hop as
> "inaccessible" even though there exists a route to the next hop in the
> routing table...It's a bit weird for me.*
> *
> *
>
> R6(config-router)#do sh ip bgp 200.200.1.0
>
> BGP routing table entry for 200.200.1.0/24, version 0
> Paths: (1 available, no best path)
>   Not advertised to any peer
>   54
>     12.12.12.12 (inaccessible) from 12.12.12.12 (12.12.12.12)
>       Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external
>
> R6(config-router)#do sh ip route 12.12.12.12
> Routing entry for 12.12.12.0/24
>   Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0
>   Routing Descriptor Blocks:
>   * 62.62.62.12
>       Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
>
> R6(config-router)#do ping 12.12.12.12
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 12.12.12.12, timeout is 2 seconds:
> !!!!!
> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 8/48/120 ms
> *
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> Ty.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Apr 06 2013 - 21:08:53 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 01 2013 - 06:47:40 ART