what  i  mean is what  is the amount of  traffic  that we need to upgrade
to  as 4 meg is not sufficient  . close to 250 users
Though the main internet is 30 meg ... i  think i can  set up  one policy
OUTBOUND on GRE tunnel on HQ that  is connecting  to this branch
to note down  what traffic  HQ is sending to SP cloud  ....in cloud  SP is
rate limiting it to 4 meb.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>wrote:
> What do you mean by "realistic" ?
> Many BW consumers are "elastic" in the sense that they will consume
> whatever you provide.
> If you don't have a fixed set of apps that you know what they need, the
> only way to define BW is via policy...
>
> -Carlos
>
> Imran Ali @ 27/08/2013 06:15 -0300 dixit:
> > Hi all ,
> >
> > we have a new   branch office that is now connected to HQ via  gre vpn.
> > Branch users are getting internet from HQ.
> >
> > Pipe from HQ  to branch  is  fixed  to   4 mb
> >
> > pipe  from HQ  to sp (internet)  is   fixed at  30 meg bw
> >
> > now how can i monitor what bandwidth will  be realistic  for the added
> > branch .
> >
> > As  most of traffic  is  returning  internet web/ftp responses , if  i
> > implement qos monitor service policy that will  obviously show 4 meg ..
> > thats because its been rate limited. to that value .
> >
> >
> > the outbound traffic is very low ..only dns requests/web requests and
> voip
> > requests
> >
> > setting any qos meter  style policy only measures outbound .
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Aug 27 2013 - 13:21:49 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Sep 01 2013 - 08:35:51 ART