Re: OSPF route-type per neighbor

Ahh shoot, well it was worth a look i suppose.

The only other thing I can think of that you can do is make separate
routing instance and redistribute between them:

 1.1.1.0/24 |R1--R3| |R2-------R4]
                 [OSPF 1 ][OSPF 2]

R1 = ASBR redistributing default E2
R2 = Internal OSPF router
R3 = ASBR, have it running a separate OSPF process for the link to R4 an
then redistribute between the OSPF processes.
R4 = internal OSPF router

You can use the route-map to set the desired routes to E1, however all the
others from OSPF1 will be E2.

Sam.

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Alexei Monastyrnyi <alexeim73_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> Hey.
> PBR won't work I am afraid, that route-map functionality is for
> redistribution only.
> Have just tested in the lab, no cigar... :-)
>
> A.
>
>
> On 18 December 2013 10:14, Sam Bibby <sammybibs_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sam,
>>
>> On R1 when redistributing set them as E2 as you put them in, that's the
>> easy part.
>>
>> For making them E1 on r2 on ingress you could *try*:
>>
>> !R2
>> ip prefix-list SET->E1->To->E2 permit 1.1.1.0/24
>> !
>> route-map MED_TYPE_MOD permit 10
>> match ip address prefix-list SET->E1->To->E2
>> set metric-type type-1
>> !
>> route-map MED_TYPE_MOD permit 1000
>> !
>> Interface fas 0/0 !!!whatever interface is learning the routes
>> ip policy route-map MED_TYPE_MOD
>> !
>>
>>
>> I am not saying this will work, but it may be worth giving it a shot in
>> the lab. Or you could try applying the route map within ospf:
>> !!R2
>> router osfp 1
>> distribute-list route-map MED_TYPE_MOD in
>>
>> But as Al said, "would make the database inconsistent", so you prob can
>> do it, but you may break stuff.
>>
>> My 2 cents :)
>>
>> \Sam
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Alexei Monastyrnyi <alexeim73_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi.
>>> I reckon you can not, as the prefix is in the OSPF database and
>>> manipulating the routs type on hop by hop basis would make the database
>>> inconsistent. Entire OSPF logic relies on the database being consistent
>>> across the board.
>>>
>>> Unless I am missing something.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> A.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> > On 18 dec 2013, at 09:39, sameer khan <khanzadap_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > hey folks
>>> > 1.1.1.0/24|R1--R3| <http://1.1.1.0/24%7CR1--R3%7C> |R2--R4
>>> >
>>> > R1 is the asbr redistributing routes from rip (1.1.1.0/24). Is it
>>> possible to
>>> > set route-type to E1 for R2 and E2 for R3.
>>> > Thanks
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Dec 18 2013 - 10:37:50 ART