Thank you. I will keep you posted on my progress as I will be implimenting Waas, i'm not sure if I will try to split the optimization between CMs. :-)
---- Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> wrote: 
> Indeed, even with context, the reason from there is that WAAS express
> does not do DRE encoding. That is not related to having a CM or not.
> 
> Yep, the CM is the keys keeper, so if you loose CM, you better not
> restart your WAEs. But that is of course if you decide to cipher the
> DRE, which is optional if I remember well.
> 
> In any case, I doubt it would be a supported scenario, but this is
> ccielab list after all, so would be fun to know if it works.
> 
> 
> JB Poplawski @ 03/12/2014 09:47 -0300 dixit:
> > I cited a page that has some context around it.
> > 
> > /2) *You lose DRE when peering two WAAS Express devices. * Since WAAS
> > Express only does DRE decode, having WAAS Express devices on both ends
> > of the connection means you effectively limit yourself to only TFO + LZ
> > even if the policy is set for TFO DRE LZ (e.g. Full optimization).  This
> > is why WAAS Express is recommended to peer with a WAAS appliance at the
> > head end./
> > 
> > Meaning if you're using WAAS Express, the only option you have is TFO
> > DRE LZ.  DRE won't be available without CM so you're down to TFO + LZ.
> > 
> > I believe the reason is CM manages the proprietary encryption of the DRE
> > Cache on the WAE boxes.  In the WAAS bootcamp I went to, I recall losing
> > the CM causes issues on being able to access the DRE cache.  My
> > notes/workbook are at the office, it would take me some digging to find it.
> > 
> > I would reach out to TAC to confirm this, as it's not best practice and
> > something I'm not familiar with.  From my WAAS 5.0 Sizing Guide (Circa
> > 2012) The 294-4G appears to be the lowest CM box you can use.  I assume
> > that can be picked up on the cheap, otherwise the Cisco WAAS VM options
> > have to go even lower.
> > 
> > HTH, 
> > JB
> > 
> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar
> > <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>> wrote:
> > 
> >     Not really so, not according to the note you cited:
> > 
> >     "Since WAAS Express only does DRE decode, ..."
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >     JB Poplawski @ 02/12/2014 23:45 -0300 dixit:
> >     > Same tech, just different hardware of where it runs. DRE Caching
> >     won't work without the CM.
> >     >
> >     > Sent from my iPhone
> >     >
> >     >> On Dec 2, 2014, at 6:36 PM, <dls152_at_cox.net
> >     <mailto:dls152_at_cox.net>> <dls152_at_cox.net <mailto:dls152_at_cox.net>> wrote:
> >     >>
> >     >> This mentions waas express. Is this the same as Waas wave appliance?
> >     >> ---- JB Poplawski <jb.poplawski_at_gmail.com
> >     <mailto:jb.poplawski_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
> >     >>> Quick google search pulls this up.
> >     >>>
> >     >>> Lose DRE caching and reporting.
> >     >>>
> >     https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11278381/waas-express-between-2-routers-cm-required
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz
> >     <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>> wrote:
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>> Gee, I don't know.
> >     >>>> The protocol would support it, because discovery and
> >     negotiation happens
> >     >>>> w/o CM (central manager) involvement.
> >     >>>> That would be fun, sharing the cost of the optimizationm :)
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>> JB Poplawski @ 02/12/2014 18:14 -0300 dixit:
> >     >>>>> AFAIK you need to have both registered to the same CM for
> >     policy push,
> >     >>>> encryption setup, etc.
> >     >>>>>
> >     >>>>> You should be able to use a VM for the CM if that's any help.
> >     >>>>>
> >     >>>>> Sent from my iPhone
> >     >>>>>
> >     >>>>>> On Dec 2, 2014, at 12:28 PM, <dls152_at_cox.net
> >     <mailto:dls152_at_cox.net>> <dls152_at_cox.net <mailto:dls152_at_cox.net>> wrote:
> >     >>>>>>
> >     >>>>>> Can you have a Wave applicance and a Central controller at site A
> >     >>>> optimize WAN trafffic to site B with its own  Wave appliance
> >     and Central
> >     >>>> controller. Or do you have to have both Wave applicances use
> >     the same
> >     >>>> Central controller in order to optimize a cross the WAN between
> >     both sites?
> >     >>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>
> >     >>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >     >>>>>>
> >     >>>>>>
> >     _______________________________________________________________________
> >     >>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >     >>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >     >>>>>
> >     >>>>>
> >     >>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >     >>>>>
> >     >>>>>
> >     _______________________________________________________________________
> >     >>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >     >>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>> --
> >     >>>> Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar
> >     <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>>  LW7 EQI  Argentina
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>>
> >     _______________________________________________________________________
> >     >>>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >     >>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     _______________________________________________________________________
> >     >>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >     >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> > 
> >     --
> >     Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>> 
> >     LW7 EQI  Argentina
> > 
> > 
> >     Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > 
> >     _______________________________________________________________________
> >     Subscription information may be found at:
> >     http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina
> 
> 
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at: 
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Dec 03 2014 - 10:17:08 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jan 01 2015 - 10:14:36 ART