From: Peter Van Oene (pvo@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Nov 06 2000 - 19:13:06 GMT-3
As most (all?) tier 1 providers use IS-IS, I think it is safe to say that most
functionality will hit ISIS more quickly than it does OSPF.
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 11/6/2000 at 2:42 PM Andrew wrote:
>Use ISIS. There is TE in OSPF now (using opaque LSA's) but it seems that
>MPLS feature additions get implemented more quickly in ISIS.
>
>At 11:43 PM 11/6/00 +0800, Li Chaoyong wrote:
>>Have every one ever implemented this?
>>Pls give me some answer.
>>
>>1. Which IGP should I use? OSPF vs ISIS?
>>2. How is TE working?
>>3. How many ROUTERS can be in one OSPF area or ISIS area?
>>
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:42 GMT-3