From: Rick Burts (burts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Nov 06 2000 - 22:22:24 GMT-3
I think you have it reversed: promiscuous can work without
peer-on-demand but peer-on-demand cannot work without
promiscuous.
Rick
Rick Burts, CCSI CCIE 4615 burts@mentortech.com
Mentor Technologies 240-568-6500 ex 6652
133 National Business Parkway 240-568-6515 fax
Annapolis, Md 20701
Chesapeake Network Solutions has now become Mentor Technologies.
Mentor Technologies is a certified Cisco Training Partner and also
a Cisco Professional Services partner.
We offer most of the Cisco training courses.
We also offer training in Checkpoint Firewall software and
Fore Systems (now Marconi) and MicroMuse.
We also provide network consulting services including
design, management, and problem solving.
We have 24 CCIEs on our staff.
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Justin Menga wrote:
> It is not a good idea to compare promiscuous and peer-on-demand-defaults.
>
> Basically, for the promiscuous to work, peer-on-demand must work.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sam Munzani [mailto:sam@munzani.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 7 November 2000 3:40 a.m.
> To: Bill Dellamar; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: dlsw
>
>
> Big difference.
>
> 1. Promiscous
> Ans: It sits idle and waits for a date. Doesn't propose from it's end. If
> some remote end asks it out it will go.
>
> 2. Peer On Demmand.
> ANS: The remote guy will not ask out to the date waiting idle unless their
> co-workers will push him to ask.
>
> I think you got the picture.
>
> Sam
>
>
> > Could someone explain the difference between
> > promiscous and peer-on-demand-defaults.
> >
> > Promiscous - will accept connections without defining
> > remote-peers.
> >
> > Peer-on-demand-defaults - is a non-configured
> > remote-peer that was connected because of an LLC2
> > session established through a border peer DLSw+
> > network.
> >
> > Aren't these the same thing? Or won't promiscous
> > accept a connection from a border peer?
> >
> > Any input would be appreciated.
> > Thanks,
> > Bill
> >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:42 GMT-3