From: Jack Heney (jheneyccie@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Nov 07 2000 - 21:43:57 GMT-3
Is that in his book? If so, what page, anf if not, could you (or somebody)
explain why having a static dlci configuration and a static mapping would
cause problems? I'll try it later to see what happens, but I can't reason
back to where this would cause a problem.
Thanks,
Jack
>From: Paul.McClarnon@sita.int
>Reply-To: Paul.McClarnon@sita.int
>To: Ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Frame relay map statements
>Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 11:19:47 +1000
>
>
>
>
>
>According to Caslow, for ospf point-to mutlipoint, you cannot have a
>frame-relay map statement as well as the interface-dlci command under the
>same
>interface, This is supposed to stuff up the mappings. Was this true for
>older
>ios versions , as I am running it as follows and it works fine-
>I don't know if it makes a difference that I am running traffic-shaping!!
>
>I interface Serial0
> ip address 57.3.160.1 255.255.255.128
> encapsulation frame-relay
> ip ospf network point-to-multipoint
> bandwidth 512
> frame-relay traffic-shaping
> frame-relay map ip 57.3.160.4 104 broadcast
> frame-relay map ip 57.3.160.8 108 broadcast
> class admin
> frame-relay interface-dlci 104
> class 16k
> frame-relay interface-dlci 108
> class 16k
> frame-relay interface-dlci 109
>
>Paul
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:43 GMT-3