Re: Load Balancing through equal cost Default routes

From: Jack Heney (jheneyccie@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Nov 10 2000 - 18:22:59 GMT-3

• Next message: Dmitry Zaitsev: "for sale"
• Previous message: Jack Heney: "connected->ospf->bgp"
• Maybe in reply to: Rajeevan Chamackalil: "Load Balancing through equal cost Default routes"
• Next in thread: JKimes1@xxxxxxx: "Re: Load Balancing through equal cost Default routes"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
If fast-swithcing is on, it should per-destination load-balance...If
fast-switching is off, it should per-packet load-balance.
Jack

>From: Rajeevan Chamackalil <Rajeevan@euclidnet.com>
>Reply-To: Rajeevan Chamackalil <Rajeevan@euclidnet.com>
>To: "'ccielab@groupstudy.com'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Load Balancing through equal cost Default routes
>Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 13:00:00 -0800
>
>I have a question on loadbalncing through default routes
>I have defined two default routes on the router pointing to two different
>next hop addresses.
>Will the router load balance among this two routes.
>
>Any help is appreciated
>Thanks
>Rajeevan
>
>
>

• Next message: Dmitry Zaitsev: "for sale"
• Previous message: Jack Heney: "connected->ospf->bgp"
• Maybe in reply to: Rajeevan Chamackalil: "Load Balancing through equal cost Default routes"
• Next in thread: JKimes1@xxxxxxx: "Re: Load Balancing through equal cost Default routes"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:44 GMT-3