From: Jim\(thrupoint\) (jgrina@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Feb 07 2001 - 15:05:05 GMT-3
Sandy,
Yes, ip route x.x.x.x y.y.y.y null0 is a static route.
Can you use this on the CCIE lab exam, maybe. Does it best fit the
instructions of the challenge you have been presented with? If, yes, then
yes, you can use it. The lab has two objectives, one to exercise your
knowledge of routing and theCisco IOS, and two, to evaluate your judgement.
Based on your knowledge and judgement, if this is the best solution, it will
be acceptable in the lab. In most cases, static routes are not the best
choice, but under some circumstances, they do represent a powerful solution.
Of course, if the lab instructions state "Create a static route to X.X.X.X
via null0 and redistribute it in OSPF", I'd do it.
Jim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sandy Thielamay" <sandyt@cndpro.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 1:01 PM
Subject: ip route xxxx null0 OSPF IGRP red.
> Hello all,
>
> I am redistributing OSPF into IGRP with a network of 170.100.0.0 =
> variable subnetted. I have an ethernet interface on my ASBR and the =
> subnet is 170.100.42.240 and of course IGRP does not see it.=20
>
> I see two possible scenarios that can happen...
>
> Scenario 1-I could be asked to put the ethernet interface into ospf and =
> redistribute it.
> Scenario2- Or the interface is not in the OSPF process.
>
> Scenario 2 can be easily fixed by redistributing connected subnets and a =
> route-map filter to allow network 170.100.42.0 only.
>
> My question is Scenario 1-Can I use the command "ip route 170.100.42.0 =
> xxxx null 0" on the exam ? or this is considered static......Is the =
> command "summary-address" suppose to work in this scenario if I have it =
> in the ospf process.=20
>
> Cheers,
>
> Sandy T.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:40 GMT-3