From: John Kaberna (jkaberna@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Feb 07 2001 - 16:26:32 GMT-3
Just for clarification you cannot use any static or default routes in the
lab unless the instructions for that section explicitly tell you to do so.
John
-- Original Message --
>Sandy,
>
>Yes, ip route x.x.x.x y.y.y.y null0 is a static route.
>
>Can you use this on the CCIE lab exam, maybe. Does it best fit the
>instructions of the challenge you have been presented with? If, yes, then
>yes, you can use it. The lab has two objectives, one to exercise your
>knowledge of routing and theCisco IOS, and two, to evaluate your judgement.
>Based on your knowledge and judgement, if this is the best solution, it
>will
>be acceptable in the lab. In most cases, static routes are not the best
>choice, but under some circumstances, they do represent a powerful solution.
>Of course, if the lab instructions state "Create a static route to X.X.X.X
>via null0 and redistribute it in OSPF", I'd do it.
>
>Jim
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Sandy Thielamay" <sandyt@cndpro.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 1:01 PM
>Subject: ip route xxxx null0 OSPF IGRP red.
>
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am redistributing OSPF into IGRP with a network of 170.100.0.0 =
>> variable subnetted. I have an ethernet interface on my ASBR and the =
>> subnet is 170.100.42.240 and of course IGRP does not see it.=20
>>
>> I see two possible scenarios that can happen...
>>
>> Scenario 1-I could be asked to put the ethernet interface into ospf and
>=
>> redistribute it.
>> Scenario2- Or the interface is not in the OSPF process.
>>
>> Scenario 2 can be easily fixed by redistributing connected subnets and
>a =
>> route-map filter to allow network 170.100.42.0 only.
>>
>> My question is Scenario 1-Can I use the command "ip route 170.100.42.0
>=
>> xxxx null 0" on the exam ? or this is considered static......Is the =
>> command "summary-address" suppose to work in this scenario if I have
it
>=
>> in the ospf process.=20
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Sandy T.
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:40 GMT-3