distribute-list ( Nth time)

From: RSiddappa@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon Feb 18 2002 - 08:05:23 GMT-3

Next message: yakout esmat: "IGRP and /32 mask loopback"
Previous message: roy bustos: "Re: Regular Expression: redistributed vs. network(ed)"
Next in thread: JOSE ANGEL MARTINEZ DE LA VARA: "RE: distribute-list ( Nth time)"
Maybe reply: JOSE ANGEL MARTINEZ DE LA VARA: "RE: distribute-list ( Nth time)"
Maybe reply: Annu Roopa: "Re: distribute-list ( Nth time)"
Maybe reply: RSiddappa@xxxxxxxxxx: "RE: distribute-list ( Nth time)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi,

I am trying to understand the Distribute-list again, (nth time)

Distribute-list 1 in serial 0

Under any routing process will work ( Regardless of link state or
Distance vector).
Provided that routing protocol is running on that interface.

II.

Distribute-list 1 out (RIP/OSPF/IGRP...)

Example :

                        Router OSPF 10
                        redistribute RIP
                        netwrok .....
                        Distribute-list 1 out rip

This is telling that give out the routes learned by RIP process, if
they permitted by access-list 1.

It is not saying that give out the routes if it learned from RIP
through redistribution and permitted access-list.
The redistribution statement under OSPF should not make any
difference.

I am asking very one pls verify and correct me if I am wrong.

Rajeev.

Next message: yakout esmat: "IGRP and /32 mask loopback"
Previous message: roy bustos: "Re: Regular Expression: redistributed vs. network(ed)"
Next in thread: JOSE ANGEL MARTINEZ DE LA VARA: "RE: distribute-list ( Nth time)"
Maybe reply: JOSE ANGEL MARTINEZ DE LA VARA: "RE: distribute-list ( Nth time)"
Maybe reply: Annu Roopa: "Re: distribute-list ( Nth time)"
Maybe reply: RSiddappa@xxxxxxxxxx: "RE: distribute-list ( Nth time)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:26 GMT-3