Re: Re: IPX EIGRP Autonomous System Discovery -- Is it possible?

From: Anthony Pace (anthonypace@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jul 09 2002 - 22:22:20 GMT-3


   
I saw this IPX thread and it provoked some questions.

What is IPX NETWORK DISCOVERY? IS it a way to have an interface
synamically gain an IPX network number?

Also, If you use sub-interfaces instead of secondaries to support
different encapsulations and your media is Ethernet, does this mean you
need to create multiple VLANs for each sub-interace and segrate the A1
network onto one "wire" and the B2 network onto another "wire"?

If this were a lab I would say that would work but in real life the
reason you might need one wore to have different networks and
encapsulations because several were allready on one wire. Is this there
a way to do the sub-interfaces where it is all still one big "wire"?

Anthony Pace

On 9 Jul 2002 15:15:43 -0000, "Prakash H Somani"
<pdsccie@rediffmail.com> said:
> Hi Nick....
>
> It works....find
>
> A. Debug output
>
> *Mar 6 04:09:29.498: IPXRIP: Marking network 222 FFFFFFFF for
> Flash Update
> *Mar 6 04:09:29.502: IPXRIP: General Query
> src=222.00b0.64db.be20, dst=222.ffff
> .ffff.ffff, packet sent (via Ethernet0/0)
> *Mar 6 04:09:29.510: IPXRIP: positing flash update to
> 22.ffff.ffff.ffff via Loo
> pback0 (broadcast)
> *Mar 6 04:09:29.510: IPXRIP: positing flash update to
> 222.ffff.ffff.ffff via Et
> hernet0/0 (broadcast)
> *Mar 6 04:09:29.514: IPXRIP: positing full update to
> 222.ffff.ffff.ffff via Eth
> ernet0/0 (broadcast)
> *Mar 6 04:09:29.566: IPX:
> Lo0:22.0002.0002.0002->22.ffff.ffff.ffff ln= 40 tc=00
> pt=01 ds=0453 ss=0453, rcvd
> *Mar 6 04:09:29.566: IPX:
> Lo0:22.0002.0002.0002->22.ffff.ffff.ffff ln= 40 tc=00
> pt=01 ds=0453 ss=0453, bad pkt
> *Mar 6 04:09:29.566: IPXRIP: suppressing null update to
> 222.ffff.ffff.ffff (Eth
> ernet0/0)
> R2(config-if)#
> *Mar 6 04:10:14.928: IPX:
> Et0/0:5.00d0.58ad.27f1->5.ffff.ffff.ffff ln= 40 tc=00
> pt=01 ds=0453 ss=0453, rcvd
> *Mar 6 04:10:14.928: IPX:
> Et0/0:5.00d0.58ad.27f1->5.ffff.ffff.ffff ln= 40 tc=00
> pt=01 ds=0453 ss=0453, bad pkt
> *Mar 6 04:10:27.429: IPXRIP: positing full update to
> 22.ffff.ffff.ffff via Loop
> back0 (broadcast)
> *Mar 6 04:10:27.437: IPX:
> Lo0:22.0002.0002.0002->22.ffff.ffff.ffff ln= 40 tc=00
> pt=01 ds=0453 ss=0453, rcvd
> *Mar 6 04:10:27.437: IPX:
> Lo0:22.0002.0002.0002->22.ffff.ffff.ffff ln= 40 tc=00
> pt=01 ds=0453 ss=0453, bad pkt
> *Mar 6 04:10:29.348: IPXRIP: positing full update to
> 222.ffff.ffff.ffff via Eth
> ernet0/0 (broadcast)
>
> B. Configuration details
>
> R5#sh runn int e0
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration:
> !
> interface Ethernet0
> ip address 150.50.50.2 255.255.255.240 secondary
> ip address 172.16.45.5 255.255.255.248
> no ip directed-broadcast
> no ip split-horizon eigrp 100
> ipx network 5 encapsulation SAP
> end
>
> R2#sh run int e0/0
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration:
> !
> interface Ethernet0/0
> ip address 172.16.45.2 255.255.255.248
> no ip directed-broadcast
> ipx network 222 encapsulation SAP
> end
>
> regards....Prakash
>
> On Tue, 09 Jul 2002 Nick Shah wrote :
> >There was a post in the archives, which allowed for a method
> >(coupled with
> >debug ip packet) to find the IP EIGRP AS ##, but nothing that I
> >know of for
> >IPX eigrp.
> >
> >Btw, I juggled (read struggled :) a bit trying to get the ipx
> >network
> >discovery.. I tried the following but somehow couldnt get it to
> >work...
> >
> >* create sub-ifs with different encapsulations, and assign
> >different ipx
> >networks to it
> >* turn on debug ipx sap , debug ipx packet, debug ipx routing (I
> >think)
> >*but it showed me everything except what I wanted (bad IPX
> >network etc.
> >etc.)
> >
> >I used secondary ipx addresses (in lieu of sub interfaces), used
> >ipx eigrp,
> >ipx rip & even NLSP.. but no luck..
> >
> >rgds
> >Nick
> >----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Todd Carswell" <acarswell@nc.rr.com>
> >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 1:23 PM
> >Subject: IPX EIGRP Autonomous System Discovery -- Is it
> >possible?
> >
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I can do IPX NETWORK discovery. It made me wonder...
> > >
> > > Is it possible to discover a neighboring IPX EIGRP Autonomous
> >System
> >Number?
> > >
> > > Thx
> > >
> > > Todd Carswell
> > >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:24 GMT-3