RE: ARP

From: Brian Dennis (brian@xxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jul 17 2002 - 19:15:50 GMT-3

Next message: Darek Kuzma: "show policy-map interface question"
Previous message: Raymond Jett: "RE: Cisco 2511 & SSH. CCIE Lab from home?"
Maybe in reply to: Wright, Jeremy: "ARP"
Next in thread: John Mistichelli: "RE: ARP"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

You really don't need to have ARP if you want to. But it will create a
lot of work for the administrators to manually put in static ARP entries
;-)

Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP Dial)

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Joe A
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 1:52 PM
To: 'Wright, Jeremy'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: ARP

Nothing will work without ARP; it has to be part of the stack.

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Wright, Jeremy
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:58 AM
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: ARP

By default, shouldn't ARP be built into the TCP/IP stack. I'm
troubleshooting some NIC's and having problems.

************************
          Jeremy Wright
             Network Analyst
             Archer Daniels Midland
              ja_wright@admworld.com
     (217)451-4063

************************

Next message: Darek Kuzma: "show policy-map interface question"
Previous message: Raymond Jett: "RE: Cisco 2511 & SSH. CCIE Lab from home?"
Maybe in reply to: Wright, Jeremy: "ARP"
Next in thread: John Mistichelli: "RE: ARP"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:34 GMT-3