From: Olive, Darren (Darren.Olive@globalcrossing.com)
Date: Mon Sep 16 2002 - 10:29:05 GMT-3
Mark
I presume that you are anticipating that Cisco will not allow the use of the
router-id configuration command. This is more convenient as you can give r1
a router-id of 1.1.1.1 & r2 a router-id of 2.2.2.2 etc. What could be more
straightforward!
These router-id's are not valid IP addresses so will not affect anything
else in your configurations.
Darren
-----Original Message-----
From: Snow, Mark [mailto:Mark.Snow@newcome.com]
Sent: 16 September 2002 14:02
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: Interfaces not specifically defined ...
Hopefully without violating and NDA, does anyone know if Cisco will make
marks against you if you introduce Loopback interfaces not SPECIFICALLY
defined in the objectives, into your IGP on that given router? Such as
introducing a new loopback for every router to use as an easy router-id for
whatever, bgp, ospf, dlsw ...??
J/W
> Mark Snow
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:53 GMT-3