From: Paglia, John (USPC.PCT.Hopewell) (JPaglia@NA2.US.ML.com)
Date: Tue Sep 17 2002 - 22:38:40 GMT-3
Mr. Shah, I couldn't agree more. In fact, when I first did this situation,
that is EXACTLY what I did. However, following my config presentation, my
Sensei said "I did not say you could redist. btwn. RIP and IGRP, so please
attempt without it" (I don't think he's being 'realistic', but rather trying
to prove a point).
Thanks for the corroboration of my original thought process!
John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Shah [SMTP:nshah@connect.com.au]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 9:32 PM
> To: Paglia, John (USPC.PCT.Hopewell); ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: IGRP Disaster
>
> John
>
> > -ISDN is indeed being used as a backup..a backup intf. situation on r5.
>
> Yes, thats ok.
>
> > -I am not redistributing from RIP to IGRP...the redist is btwn. RIP and
> > OSPF, and btwn. OSPF and IGRP.
> > -Basically, since RIP and IGRP have the lower # of routes (and I'm not a
> > strong typist), I have redists that look kinda like this:
>
> This looks ok, albeit prima facie, I think if IGRP is used on the backup
> link, then in case of the failure of frame relay, you should still be able
> to see RIP routes on R2, so you will need to redistribute between IGRP &
> RIP
> (dont you think ?)
>
> rgds
> Nick
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:55 GMT-3