From: MADMAN (dave@interprise.com)
Date: Fri Sep 20 2002 - 11:10:40 GMT-3
Still don't think I would replace you VXR but the 3550 does supoort
BGP:
C3550-L3#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
C3550-L3(config)#router bgp 1
C3550-L3(config-router)#?
Router configuration commands:
address-family Enter Address Family command mode
aggregate-address Configure BGP aggregate entries
auto-summary Enable automatic network number summarization
bgp BGP specific commands
default Set a command to its defaults
default-information Control distribution of default information
default-metric Set metric of redistributed routes
distance Define an administrative distance
distribute-list Filter networks in routing updates
exit Exit from routing protocol configuration mode
help Description of the interactive help system
maximum-paths Forward packets over multiple paths
neighbor Specify a neighbor router
network Specify a network to announce via BGP
no Negate a command or set its defaults
redistribute Redistribute information from another routing
protocol
synchronization Perform IGP synchronization
table-map Map external entry attributes into routing table
timers Adjust routing timers
C3550-L3(config-router)#
Dave
Senthil Kumar wrote:
>
> good for cisco, else 3550 will replace many routers. it it only supported
> bgp, i would have replaced some VXRs with 3550.
>
> i am waiting for my 3550 kit to do more..
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Terry (ETL) [mailto:David.Terry@etl.ericsson.se]
> Sent: 20 September 2002 13:25
> To: 'Senthil Kumar'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: 3550 vs 2950
>
> Unfortuntaley it's a limitiation with subinterfaces be it ISL or
> dot1q.......
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Senthil Kumar [mailto:senthil.kumar@intechnology.co.uk]
> Sent: 20 September 2002 13:22
> To: David Terry (ETL); ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: 3550 vs 2950
>
> cant you use isl for for subinterfaces..
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Terry (ETL) [mailto:David.Terry@etl.ericsson.se]
> Sent: 20 September 2002 13:18
> To: 'Senthil Kumar'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: 3550 vs 2950
>
> This is not directly related to 3550 vs 2950 but the 3550 does not have
> full router functionality you take for granted on a "proper router" !!!!
>
> The 3550 does not support dot1q routing which is a major issue. The box can
> only route on a physical port not a sub-interface. Although it can route on
> a switched virtual interface. The only thing there is that you can't apply
> QoS on a switched virtual interface !!!!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Senthil Kumar [mailto:senthil.kumar@intechnology.co.uk]
> Sent: 20 September 2002 12:56
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: 3550 vs 2950
>
> 3550 is more of a router than a switch. it does all that a router can except
> some bits like..it doesnt support bgp.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Senthil Kumar [mailto:senthil.kumar@intechnology.co.uk]
> Sent: 20 September 2002 12:42
> To: Warner, Thomas S; 'Bob Sinclair'; Pieter Jordaan;
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: 3550 vs 2950
>
> 3550 supports per port qos at layer2 to layer 4 levels.. labs after nov 4th
> might have this in
>
> 3550 also supports dscp along with precedence, with a map table and more
> than one queue on inbound and outbound.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Warner, Thomas S [mailto:thomas.s.warner@lmco.com]
> Sent: 20 September 2002 11:52
> To: 'Bob Sinclair'; Pieter Jordaan; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: 3550 vs 2950
>
> The 2950 does not support ISL trunking - only 802.1q trunking.
>
> Tom
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Sinclair [mailto:bsin@erols.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 6:30 AM
> To: Pieter Jordaan; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: 3550 vs 2950
>
> One difference I have seen: the 3550 seems to be the first of the IOS
> switches to support PAgP. That is, the first that will actually negotiate
> trunking.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pieter Jordaan" <pieterj@is.co.za>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:24 AM
> Subject: 3550 vs 2950
>
> > Guys
> >
> > Apart from the L3 capabilities, are there any major differences between
> the
> > 2950 and the 3550, Talking from a pure switching point of view.
> >
> > IE: Do you configure vLAN, trunks, ether channel and STP in the same way?
> Do
> > you also add the management IP in the same way or is it different?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "This e-mail may contain confidential information and may be legally
> > privileged and is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If
> > you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you may not use,
> > distribute or copy this document in any manner whatsoever. Kindly also
> > notify the sender immediately by telephone, and delete the e-mail. When
> > addressed to clients of the company from where this e-mail originates
> ("the
> > sending company ") any opinion or advice contained in this e-mail is
> subject
> > to the terms and conditions expressed in any applicable terms of business
> or
> > client engagement letter . The sending company does not accept liability
> for
> > any damage, loss or expense arising from this e-mail and/or from the
> > accessing of any files attached to this e-mail."
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> CitC Virus Scanning Service powered by SkyLabs. For further information
> visit
> http://www.citc.it
>
> ___
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> CitC Virus Scanning Service powered by SkyLabs. For further information
> visit
> http://www.citc.it
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> CitC Virus Scanning Service powered by SkyLabs. For further information
> visit
> http://www.citc.it
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> CitC Virus Scanning Service powered by SkyLabs. For further information
> visit
> http://www.citc.it
>
> ___
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> CitC Virus Scanning Service powered by SkyLabs. For further information
> visit
> http://www.citc.it
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> CitC Virus Scanning Service powered by SkyLabs. For further information
> visit
> http://www.citc.it
>
> ___
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> CitC Virus Scanning Service powered by SkyLabs. For further information visit
> http://www.citc.it
-- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367"You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston Churchill
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:43:58 GMT-3