From: Donny MATEO (donny.mateo@sg.ca-indosuez.com)
Date: Mon Sep 23 2002 - 23:26:47 GMT-3
Hi Brian,
in that case what is the use of summarization in dynamic routing protocol ? Are we suppose to create
a tunnel/secondary address for every subnet which is not the same as your classfull routing protocol
?
Or having said it, they don't care as long as we get rid of the null0 route using the following
1. No discard-route internal for OSPF internal route only
2. Use distribute-list for any other else
Distribute-list 1 in Null0
access1 permit any
Or strictly no summarization unless told and deal with discontiguous subnets with the following
1. If you wanna take risk of creating another subnet and another interface, use tunnel.
2. Use secondary addressing
3. create a dummy routing process in case of OSPF
Donny
This message is for information purposes only and its content
should not be construed as an offer, or solicitation of an offer,
to buy or sell any banking or financial instruments or services
and no representation or warranty is given in respect of its
accuracy, completeness or fairness. The material is subject
to change without notice. You should take your own independent
tax, legal and other professional advice in respect of the content
of this message. This message may contain confidential or
legally privileged material and may not be copied, redistributed
or published (in whole or in part) without our prior written consent.
This email may have been intercepted, partially destroyed,
arrive late, incomplete or contain viruses and no liability is
accepted by any member of the Credit Agricole Indosuez group
as a result. If you are not the intended recipient of this message,
please immediately notify the sender and delete this message
from your computer.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:44:01 GMT-3