From: Bernard Omrani (Bernard@networkking.net)
Date: Sun Sep 29 2002 - 18:13:32 GMT-3
Chris,
Unfortunately, there is none.
Or, there is one, but the proctor does not like it ;-)
I heard some one (Raj?) did it using a Tunnel. I am yet to see it in action.
Bernard
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Hugo [mailto:chrishugo@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 12:22 PM
To: Bernard Omrani; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: What if OSPF routes have shorter masks than RIP?
Bernard,
The team and I would like to know your method that will give us that slam-dunk. :)
chris hugo
Bernard Omrani wrote:
Secondary addressing on the interface works, but it is not a slam-dunk
method either. It gets real nasty if you forget to take care of the
split-horizon issue.
Bernard
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hansang Bae [mailto:hbae@nyc.rr.com]
> Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 10:44 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: What if OSPF routes have shorter masks than RIP?
>
> At 12:12 AM 9/29/2002 -0600, Young K. Bae wrote:
> >Hi Chris,
> >I tried that last night, but it didn't work. Has this been tested by
> >someone else?
>
>
> Using secondary addressing to overcome VLSM issues is a common
practice.
> There are other methods as well, but certainly, secondary addressing
can
> be made to work.
>
> hsb
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 07:44:07 GMT-3