From: patcunnin@yahoo.com
Date: Thu Jun 26 2003 - 16:14:04 GMT-3
This is different. If I do not use the network command
for the loopback and do a redistribute connected
instead, there will be a type lsa in the ospf
database. Why doesn't this get propagated to eigrp
when I do a redistribute ospf under eigrp?
Thanks
--- Looking to be CCIE <ccie@nc.rr.com> wrote:
> Yes you will have to redist conn after 12.1(3)
>
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/104/redist-conn.html
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <patcunnin@yahoo.com>
> To: "Jason Cash" <cash2001@swbell.net>;
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 2:38 PM
> Subject: RE: redist of connected routes
>
>
> > Did you ever get an answer? It appears that you
> have
> > to redistribute connect in both routing protocols.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > --- Jason Cash <cash2001@swbell.net> wrote:
> > > I had asked this one back in April...here is a
> link
> > > in the Archive:
> > >
> > >
> >
>
http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200304/msg00083.html
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > > patcunnin@yahoo.com
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:53 AM
> > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >
> > > If OSPF is doing a redistribute connected for
> > > loopback0 and I'm redistributing OSPF into
> EIGRP.
> > > Will
> > > the loopback get propagated in EIGRP or do I
> need to
> > > do a redistribute connected under EIGRP? It
> appears
> > > that I have to do a redistribute connected under
> > > EIGRP. I thought ISIS was the only protocol that
> > > needed a redist connected?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> > > http://sbc.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 04 2003 - 11:11:11 GMT-3