From: McCallum, Robert (robert.mccallum@thus.net)
Date: Wed May 05 2004 - 04:15:15 GMT-3
Why don't you try downgrading or upgrading to a different version of code.
Robert McCallum
CCIE #8757 R&S
01415663448
07818002241
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ccie [mailto:ccie@tisolutions.biz]
> Sent: 05 May 2004 08:12
> To: Richard Dumoulin
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Vlan issue
>
>
> so is it a bug? the 3com are using 802.1q so it should work...
>
> any ideas would be appreciated
>
> tia
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Dumoulin [mailto:richard.dumoulin@vanco.es]
> Sent: 04 May 2004 17:30
> To: McCallum, Robert; ccie; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Vlan issue
>
>
>
> Well, encapsulation failure only means that ARP was not
> successfull.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:robert.mccallum@thus.net]
> Sent: martes, 04 de mayo de 2004 18:24
> To: Richard Dumoulin; ccie; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Vlan issue
>
>
> When you do the ping do a debug ip pack detail. If you
> see encaps failures ta da as Richard says below.
>
> Robert McCallum
> CCIE #8757 R&S
> 01415663448
> 07818002241
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Richard Dumoulin [mailto:richard.dumoulin@vanco.es]
> > Sent: 04 May 2004 16:32
> > To: ccie; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: Vlan issue
> >
> >
> > An interface fastethernet controller bugg on your 2600 ? Is
> > your 3Com negociating the trunk or not ?
> >
> > --Richard
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ccie [mailto:ccie@tisolutions.biz]
> > Sent: martes, 04 de mayo de 2004 17:15
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: OT: Vlan issue
> >
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > This is the situation:
> >
> > I have a 3com 4400 switch with 2 vlan (data and voice)
> > connecting to a single fast ethernet port on a 2600 router.
> > I have created sub interfaces with 802.1q encaps. First sub
> > is in vlan 1 native and the second sub is in vlan 2 non
> > native. When I ping a device in vlan 2 i get and incomplete
> > arp entry. Any ideas why....
> >
> > I have tried adjusting the arp timeout and using extended
> > pings with a longer time between packets with no success.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Ben
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________
> > This email is confidential, may be legally privileged and is
> > for the intended recipient only. Access, disclosure, copying,
> > distribution or reliance on any information it contains is
> > prohibited and may be a criminal offence. Please delete if
> > received in error and email confirmation to sender.
> >
> > Please note that any views expressed in this message are
> > those of the individual sender, except where the sender
> > specifically states them to be the views of tisolutions ltd.
> > ________________________________________________
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________
>
> > _________
> > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study
> > materials from: http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________
>
> > _________
> > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study
> > materials from: http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study
> materials from: http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 11:12:04 GMT-3