Re: BGP route by way of no BGP RTR

From: Carlos G Mendioroz (tron@huapi.ba.ar)
Date: Fri Jun 04 2004 - 15:17:41 GMT-3

• Next message: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: Having a problem with as Async and EIGRP"
• Previous message: Zack Damen: "Having a problem with as Async and EIGRP"
• Maybe in reply to: B: "BGP route by way of no BGP RTR"
• Next in thread: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: BGP route by way of no BGP RTR"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

And the problem is ?
R1 knows (via OSPF) how to reach R3 because the link R2-R3 is part of
the knowledge R2 has and gives to R1.
Converselly, R3 knows via EIGRP how to reach R1.
So BGP is up, and all are happy ? (Because R1 and R3 know how to reach
next hop)

???? wrote:

> Hi,group
>
> I$B!G(Bm in trouble about BGP routing.
> Scenario is following.
>
>
> R1-----------(ospf)--------R2-----------(eigrp)---------R3
> BGP<----------------------neighbor------------------>BGP
>
> R1,R2:OSPF
> R2,R3:EIGRP
> R1,R3:BGP
>
> In scenario ,redistributing is prohibited.
> R2 is not running bgp.
> If the protocol of between R2 and R3 is ospf,
> I would use tunneling and igp.but can$B!G(Bt $B!D(B
> Any idea ?
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>

-- 
Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron@huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina

• Next message: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: Having a problem with as Async and EIGRP"
• Previous message: Zack Damen: "Having a problem with as Async and EIGRP"
• Maybe in reply to: B: "BGP route by way of no BGP RTR"
• Next in thread: Carlos G Mendioroz: "Re: BGP route by way of no BGP RTR"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 03 2004 - 19:40:32 GMT-3